On predication
On predication
复制标题
论预测
DOI：
10.21248/hpsg.2009.11
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Stefan Müller
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Stefan Müller
本文讨论了英语、德语和丹麦语的系动词结构，并认为统一的
对所有系词结构的分析是不恰当的。我提供了来自德国的证据
除了识别系词之外，还应该是系词的提升变体。一元模式
提供将可用作谓词 NP 的参数的引用 NP 的映射。数据
来自丹麦语表明谓语 NP 可以是规范结构中的主语。一个账户
提供了此类规范结构，并且谓词和谓词的不同行为
解释了关于问题标签的规范结构。类似的对比可以是
在德国左位错结构中发现，这是根据本文所做的假设得出的。
对复杂谓词形成的修改处理允许减少选择特征
（即废除 xcomp 或 vcomp）并统一处理谓词
系动词结构和结果次谓词中的短语。这会产生一个帐户
早期分析仍无法解释的构成顺序变体。
This paper discusses copula constructions in English, German, and Danish and argues that a uniform
analysis of all copula constructions is inappropriate. I provide evidence from German that there
should be a raising variant of the copula in addition to an identificational copula. A unary schema
is provided that maps referential NPs that can be used as arguments onto predicational NPs. Data
from Danish shows that predicational NPs can be subjects in specificational structures. An account
for such specificational structures is provided and the different behaviour of predicational and
specificational structures with regard to question tags is explained. A similar contrast can be
found in German left dislocation structures, which follows from the assumptions made in this paper.
A modified treatment of complex predicate formation allows for a reduction of selectional features
(that is abolishing of xcomp or vcomp) and for a uniform treatment of predicational
phrases in copula constructions and resultative secondary predicates. This yields an account for
constituent order variants that remained unexplained by earlier analyses.