Strengthening experimental design by balancing potentially confounding variables across treatment groups.
Strengthening experimental design by balancing potentially confounding variables across treatment groups.
复制标题
通过平衡治疗组之间潜在的混淆变量来加强实验设计。
DOI:
10.1097/00006199-199711000-00009
复制
发表时间:
1997
期刊:
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Zeller,DL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zeller,R;Good,M;Anderson,GC;Zeller,DL
Simple random assignment of subjects to treatment and control groups provides two major benefits to experimental research:(a) balance of known and unknown subject idiosyncracies across groups and (b) unbiased estimates of both treatment effects and random error variation. However, simple random assignment does not guarantee that groups will be comparable. For example, studies using simple random assignment (hereafter referred to as random assignment) are at risk for producing groups that are imbalanced in one or more levels of confounding covariates (Silverman, 1985). This is especially true of small studies, but it is also a concern in large ones (Cook & Campbell, 1979). Minimization is a method of assignment to groups that reduces the amount of bias by controlling for as many known extraneous sources of variation as possible. It produces groups that are comparable in size and distribution of potentially confounding covariates (Pocock, 1979; Pocock & Simon, 1975; White & Freedman, 1978).This article is written for nurse researchers who are designing randomized clinical trials both as their research programs mature and as the demand for tested nursing interventions increases. Building on the work of Conlon and Anderson (1990), this report includes a rationale for using minimization in intervention studies and describes the development and testing of the minimization-8 (min-8) computer program for assigning subjects to as many as eight groups. Nurse researchers who use minimization will have a powerful, rigorous, and feasible research advantage.