Main concepts for two picture description tasks: An addition to.

Main concepts for two picture description tasks: An addition to.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/02687038.2018.1561417
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Dalton SGH
Dalton SGH
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Richardson JD;Dalton SGH

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

对失语症患者话语的命题分析由来已久,对我们理解这一群体中的沟通障碍有了重要的进步。最近,话语测量被认为是主要的结果测量,许多人呼吁改进话语测量的心理测量学特性。为促进话语分析在失语症患者中的使用,为健康控制提供主要概念分析检查表和描述性统计数据,分析在AphasiaBank数据库协议中使用的树中的猫和拒绝的伞叙事任务。从AphasiaBank数据库下载了92份对照成绩单,分为四个年龄组(20-39岁;40-59岁;60-79岁;80岁以上)。确定了相关概念,至少三分之一的对照样本所说的概念被认为是主要概念。使用多级编码系统来确定控制演讲者产生的主要概念的准确性和完整性。本文提供了两个语篇任务的主要概念核对表。报告和审查描述性统计数据,以帮助读者评估规范性数据。这些清单为临床医生和研究人员提供了一种工具,可以可靠地评估失语症患者的话语。它们还有助于解决可用来比较失语症患者和健康对照组的心理测量数据的差距。
Proposition analysis of the discourse of persons with aphasia has a long history, yielding important advancements in our understanding of communication impairments in this population. Recently, discourse measures have been considered primary outcome measures, and multiple calls have been made for improved psychometric properties of discourse measures. To advance the use of discourse analysis in persons with aphasia by providing Main Concept Analysis checklists and descriptive statistics for healthy control performance on the analysis for the Cat in the Tree and Refused Umbrella narrative tasks utilized in the AphasiaBank database protocol. Ninety-two control transcripts, stratified into four age groups (20–39 years; 40–59; 60–79; 80+), were downloaded from the AphasiaBank database. Relevant concepts were identified, and those spoken by at least one-third of the control sample were considered to be a main concept. A multi-level coding system was used to determine the accuracy and completeness of the main concepts produced by control speakers. Main concept checklists for two discourse tasks are provided. Descriptive statistics are reported and examined to assist readers with evaluation of the normative data. These checklists provide clinicians and researchers with a tool to reliably assess the discourse of persons with aphasia. They also help address the gap in available psychometric data with which to compare persons with aphasia to healthy controls.