Review and Development of Best Practices for Toxicity Tests with Dreissenid Mussels
Review and Development of Best Practices for Toxicity Tests with Dreissenid Mussels
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/etc.5648
复制
发表时间：
2023-05
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
D. Waller;Sherri F. Pucherelli;M. Barbour;Samantha Tank;Matthew J Meulemans;Jeremy K Wise;Angelique D Dahlberg;D. Aldridge;R. Claudi;W. Cope;P. Gillis;D. Kashian;Denise A. Mayer;Kelly A. Stockton-Fiti;W. Wong
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Waller;Sherri F. Pucherelli;M. Barbour;Samantha Tank;Matthew J Meulemans;Jeremy K Wise;Angelique D Dahlberg;D. Aldridge;R. Claudi;W. Cope;P. Gillis;D. Kashian;Denise A. Mayer;Kelly A. Stockton-Fiti;W. Wong
自20世纪80年代引入北美以来，各研究机构一直在使用一系列测试方法，研究开发有效防治入侵贻贝(Dreissena Polyma和D.rostriformis bugensis)的工具。实验方法和报告的不一致给比较数据、重复实验和应用结果带来了挑战。入侵贻贝协作组于2019年成立了毒性测试工作组(TTWG)，以确定“最佳实践”，并指导制定淡水贻贝毒性测试协议的标准框架。我们回顾了与实验室贝类毒性试验相关的文献，并确定了标准指南的使用程度及其对鱼纲贻贝试验的适用性。我们从99项来自同行评议和灰色文献的研究中提取了详细的方法，并对安置前和定居后的贻贝进行了单独的分析。我们确定了方法和途径的特定组成部分，可以对鱼纲贻贝进行提炼或标准化。这些组成部分包括物种鉴定、收集方法、大小/年龄类别区分、维护做法、测试标准、样本量、应对措施、报告参数、暴露方法和死亡标准。我们咨询了水生毒理学和贝类生物学领域的专家对我们的建议。本审查所载最后建议的依据是已公布的标准准则、已公布的和灰色文献中报告的方法以及工作组成员和一个外部小组的专门知识。此外，我们的综述确定了对鱼纲贻贝测试的研究需求，包括改进的早期生命阶段测试方法，生命阶段和鱼纲贻贝物种之间的比较数据，纳入参考毒物，以及对非目标物种(即其他水生生物)的额外测试。环境毒物化学2023；42：1649-1666。©2023加拿大国王陛下。环境毒理学和化学，由威利期刊有限责任公司代表SETAC出版。经加拿大环境和气候变化部部长许可复制。这篇文章是由美国政府雇员贡献的，他们的工作在美国属于公共领域。
Since their introduction to North America in the 1980s, research to develop effective control tools for invasive mussels (Dreissena polymorpha and D. rostriformis bugensis) has been ongoing across various research institutions using a range of testing methods. Inconsistencies in experimental methods and reporting present challenges for comparing data, repeating experiments, and applying results. The Invasive Mussel Collaborative established the Toxicity Testing Work Group (TTWG) in 2019 to identify “best practices” and guide development of a standard framework for dreissenid mussel toxicity testing protocols. We reviewed the literature related to laboratory‐based dreissenid mussel toxicity tests and determined the degree to which standard guidelines have been used and their applicability to dreissenid mussel testing. We extracted detailed methodology from 99 studies from the peer‐reviewed and gray literature and conducted a separate analysis for studies using presettlement and postsettlement mussels. We identified specific components of methods and approaches that could be refined or standardized for dreissenid mussels. These components included species identification, collection methods, size/age class distinction, maintenance practices, testing criteria, sample size, response measures, reporting parameters, exposure methods, and mortality criteria. We consulted experts in the field of aquatic toxicology and dreissenid mussel biology on our proposed. The final recommendations contained in the present review are based on published standard guidelines, methods reported in the published and gray literature, and the expertise of TTWG members and an external panel. In addition, our review identifies research needs for dreissenid mussel testing including improved methods for early–life stage testing, comparative data on life stages and between dreissenid mussel species, inclusion of a reference toxicant, and additional testing of nontarget species (i.e., other aquatic organisms). Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:1649–1666. © 2023 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.