DYNAMICS OF HIERARCHY FORMATION - THE SEQUENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF DOMINANCE RELATIONSHIPS
DYNAMICS OF HIERARCHY FORMATION - THE SEQUENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF DOMINANCE RELATIONSHIPS
复制标题
DOI:
10.1163/156853982x00364
复制
发表时间:
1982-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
1.3
通讯作者:
CHASE, ID
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
CHASE, ID
A method for investigating the behavioral sequences used in forming dominance hierarchies is presented. The 4 possible sequences for the formation of the first 2 dominance relationships in groups of 3 individuals (triads) are described by designating the winner in the first relationship formed as the initial dominant, the loser as the initial subordinate, and the animal not involved as the bystander. Although each sequence has an equal probability of occurrence if dominance relationships are formed randomly, 2 of the sequences have different implications for the formation of the empirically common linear and near linear hierarchies than the other 2. Linear and near linear hierarchies are, by definition, composed of all or nearly all triads with transitive dominance relationships (A dominates B, B dominates C and A dominates C), while hierarchies far from linearity have many triads with intrasitive relationships (A dominates B, B dominates C and C dominates A). In an application of the method developed, sequences of dominance relationships formed in groups of 3 and 4 chickens were analyzed. A further set of results indicated that intrasitive relationships were common in constructed triads where chickens met only as component pairs and not in real triads where all 3 met together at the same time. Hierarchy formation probably is best viewed as a developmental process where preceding dominance interactions influence succeeding ones. This view was characterized as the jigsaw puzzle model of hierarchy formation, and it was contrasted with the more classical approach of explaining hierarchy structures by differences in the individual characteristics of group members. Many species beside chickens form linear and near linear hierarchies, and it was hypothesized that Double Dominance [wherein the initial dominant goes on to dominate the bystander] and Double Subordinance [wherein the bystander later dominates the initial subordinate] sequences also compose the majority of sequence occurrences in many of these species. The data available for other species were reviewed; they offer tentative support for the hypothesis.