Solidarity and the Encapsulated and Divided Histories of Health and Human Rights
Solidarity and the Encapsulated and Divided Histories of Health and Human Rights
复制标题
团结与健康与人权的封闭和分裂的历史
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Khoo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Khoo
这篇文章探讨了人权、健康和生物伦理学中的核心但被忽视的团结原则，这一概念容易引起争议、回避和混淆。它通过讨论团结与不平等的概括和人权的划分的共同演变，解决了法律、哲学和政治中对团结的普遍矛盾心理。它认为，重新树立团结观念对于满足日益突出的道德要求至关重要，因为两性平等和责任的个别化与关怀和集体责任的缺失同时存在。具体化、(相互)依赖、关怀和不对称等问题被占主导地位的自由派方法忽视了，但它们是重新思考团结的关键。
This article examines the central but neglected principle of solidarity in human rights, health and bioethics, a concept subject to contention, evasion and confusion. It addresses the general ambivalence toward solidarity within law, philosophy and politics by discussing solidarity’s co-evolution with inegalitarian encapsulations and divisions of human rights. It argues that a renewed conception of solidarity is essential to meet increasingly salient ethical demands, as gender equality and the individualization of responsibilities coincide with deficits of care and collective responsibility. Questions of embodiedness, (inter)dependence, care and asymmetry are neglected by dominant liberal approaches, but are key to rethinking solidarity.