AUTOMATIC ISLAM: DIVINE ANARCHY AND THE MACHINES OF GOD
AUTOMATIC ISLAM: DIVINE ANARCHY AND THE MACHINES OF GOD
复制标题
自动伊斯兰教：神圣的无政府状态和上帝的机器
DOI：
10.1017/s1479244313000309
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
KAZMI Z
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
KAZMI Z
本文探讨了“穆斯林无政府主义”的特殊变体，作为激进的反独裁宗教的独特形式，如何通过借鉴知识传统和话语策略来颠覆传统的伊斯兰解释学方法。通过求助于自治和自动主义之间的相互关系，特别是在西方先锋派和反文化美学，它阐明了自动超越和复古未来主义哲学的进口，作为激进自由主义方法对伊斯兰教的精神解放的新解释技术。我的目的是展示，在社会和宗教现象研究中被忽视的丰富的、多价的自动主义概念，如何成为阐释穆斯林无政府主义特定流派的解释学的一种有用方式。在这样做的时候，本文还挑战了对“激进”伊斯兰教的理解，以及好战和自由主义之间的限制性两极分化，这种两极分化已经成为全球伊斯兰教讨论的框架。为此，我专注于彼得·兰伯恩·威尔逊（又名哈基姆·贝伊）、迈克尔·穆罕默德·奈特和雅库布·伊斯兰的思想。
This essay explores how particular variants of “Muslim anarchism”, as distinct forms of radical anti-authoritarian religion, subvert conventional approaches to Islamic hermeneutics by drawing on intellectual traditions and discursive strategies external to them. Through recourse to the mutuality between autonomy and automatism, most notably in Western avant-garde and countercultural aesthetics, it elucidates the import of automatic transcendence and retro-futurist imaginaries as novel interpretative techniques for spiritual emancipation in radically libertarian approaches to Islam. My aim is to show how the rich, multivalent concept of automatism, neglected in studies of social and religious phenomena, can be a useful way of elucidating the hermeneutics of specific strands of Muslim anarchism. In doing so, the paper also challenges received understandings of “radical” Islam and the restrictive polarity between militancy and liberalism that has come to frame discussion on global Islam. To this end, I focus on the thought of Peter Lamborn Wilson (aka Hakim Bey), Michael Muhammad Knight and Yakoub Islam.