Accuracies and conservation errors of various ghost fluid methods for multi-medium Riemann problem
Accuracies and conservation errors of various ghost fluid methods for multi-medium Riemann problem
复制标题
多媒体黎曼问题各种幻影流体方法的精度和守恒误差
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcp.2011.03.021
复制
发表时间:
2011-06
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Liu, Tiegang
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xu, Liang;Liu, Tiegang
Since the (original) ghost fluid method (OGFM) was proposed by Fedkiw et al. in 1999 [5], a series of other GFM-based methods such as the gas–water version GFM (GWGFM), the modified GFM (MGFM) and the real GFM (RGFM) have been developed subsequently. Systematic analysis, however, has yet to be carried out for the various GFMs on their accuracies and conservation errors. In this paper, we develop a technique to rigorously analyze the accuracies and conservation errors of these different GFMs when applied to the multi-medium Riemann problem with a general equation of state (EOS). By analyzing and comparing the interfacial state provided by each GFM to the exact one of the original multi-medium Riemann problem, we show that the accuracy of interfacial treatment can achieve “third-order accuracy” in the sense of comparing to the exact solution of the original mutli-medium Riemann problem for the MGFM and the RGFM, while it is of at most “first-order accuracy” for the OGFM and the GWGFM when the interface approach is actually near in balance. Similar conclusions are also obtained in association with the local conservation errors. A special test method is exploited to validate these theoretical conclusions from the numerical viewpoint.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Xu, Liang;Liu, Tiegang
通讯作者:
Liu, Tiegang
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
S. O. Unverdi;G. Tryggvason
通讯作者:
S. O. Unverdi;G. Tryggvason
DOI:
10.1142/9781860949524_0027
发表时间:
2002-12
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
T. Liu;K. C. Hung;B. Khoo
通讯作者:
T. Liu;K. C. Hung;B. Khoo
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
D. Nguyen
通讯作者:
D. Nguyen
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Ronald Fedkiw;A. Marquina;B. Merriman
通讯作者:
Ronald Fedkiw;A. Marquina;B. Merriman