Effects of category-based expectancy violation on affect-related evaluations: Toward a comprehensive model
Effects of category-based expectancy violation on affect-related evaluations: Toward a comprehensive model
复制标题
DOI：
10.1207/15324830051036171
复制
发表时间：
2000-06-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Bettencourt, BA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kernahan, C;Bartholow, BD;Bettencourt, BA
我们研究了基于类别的预期违规所展开的过程。在包括黑人和白人参与者的实验 1 中，对群体内和群体外目标学历的描述要么违反了要么与各自群体类别的相关基于类别的预期一致。结果表明，无论参与者是群体内成员还是群体外成员，违反预期都与更极端的情感相关评估相关。此外，这些与情感相关的评估比归因更快地进行。在实验2中，使用了一种判断促进范式，其中比较了参与者对违反期望的目标进行情感相关评估和归因的反应时间。与实验 1 一致，结果表明，与情感相关的评估比归因更快，并且促进分数表明与情感相关的评估可能是归因的中介。结果与预期违反理论一致，并支持情感相关评估调节目标特征和归因过程之间关系的观点。
We examined the processes that unfold from category-based expectancy violations. In Experiment 1, which included both Black and White participants, descriptions of in-group and out-group targets' academic credentials either violated or were consistent with relevant category-based expectancies for their respective group category. The results showed that expectancy violations were associated with more extreme affect-related evaluations, regardless of whether the participants were in-group or out-group members. Moreover, these affect-related evaluations were made more quickly than attributions. In Experiment 2, a judgment facilitation paradigm was used in which participants' response times to make affect-related evaluations and attributions regarding expectancy violating targets were compared. Consistent with Experiment 1, the results showed that affect-related evaluations were made more quickly than attributions, and facilitation scores indicated that affect-related evaluations are likely mediators of attributions. Results were consistent with the expectancy-violation theory, and supported the idea that affect-related evaluations mediate the relation between target characteristics and attributional processes.