Dead end jobs or a path to economic well being? The consequences of non-standard work among people with disabilities.
Dead end jobs or a path to economic well being? The consequences of non-standard work among people with disabilities.
复制标题
工作是死胡同还是经济繁荣之路？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2002
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
Lisa Schur
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lisa Schur
非标准工作如何影响残疾工人的经济福祉，当非标准工人利用残疾诉讼挑战歧视并改善其经济机会时会发生什么？本研究使用来自当前人口调查、收入和项目参与调查以及对法律的案例的Lexis搜索的数据来帮助回答这些问题。残疾工人从事临时工作、独立订约和非全时工作的可能性几乎是非残疾工人的两倍。非标准残疾工人的工资和福利较低，这是由于他们所从事的工作类型以及工作类型中的残疾差距，这导致他们的贫困率较高。然而，即使消除了这些工资差距，他们的贫困率仍然很高，因为他们的工作时间比没有残疾的非标准工人少，而且集中在低收入职业。在试图通过残疾诉讼改善其机会时，非标准工人只在少数情况下占上风。几个政策的影响的诉讼和调查数据进行了讨论。
How do non-standard jobs affect the economic well-being of workers with disabilities, and what happens when non-standard workers use disability lawsuits to challenge discrimination and improve their economic opportunities? This study uses data from the Current Population Survey, the Survey of Income and Program Participation, and a Lexis search of legal cases to help answer these questions. Temporary employment, independent contracting, and part-time employment are almost twice as likely among workers with disabilities as among those without disabilities. Non-standard workers with disabilities receive lower pay and fewer benefits due both to the types of job they hold, and disability gaps within job types, which contribute to their high poverty rates. They would continue to have high poverty rates even if these pay gaps were eliminated, however, because they work fewer hours than non-standard workers without disabilities and are concentrated in lower-paying occupations. In attempting to improve their opportunities through disability lawsuits, non-standard workers prevail in only a small minority of cases. Several policy implications of the lawsuits and survey data are discussed.