BIOMETRICAL GENETIC APPROACH TO INTELLIGENCE AND SCHIZOPHRENIA
BIOMETRICAL GENETIC APPROACH TO INTELLIGENCE AND SCHIZOPHRENIA
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/19485565.1973.9988053
复制
发表时间:
1973-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
FULKER, DW
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
FULKER, DW
Recently, the psychogenetics group at Birmingham University has been considering the problem of applying biometrical genetics to the behavior of man. While these methods had proved their worth when applied to the behavior of animals (Broadhurst, 1960; Broadhurst and Jinks, 1961, 1966; Fulker, Wilcock, and Broadhurst, 1972), the work of Cattell, one of the pioneers of human psychogenetics, suggested that the same clear-cut results could not be expected with humans (Cattell, 1957, 1965). A preliminary investigation at Birmingham resulted in the development of an appropriate methodology and a reanalysis of existing data, the outcome of which suggested that biometrical genetics could be applied to the analysis of human behavior with far greater ease than was previously thought (Jinks and Fulker, 1970). It is the purpose of the present paper to give a brief account of this approach and its underlying assumptions and to illustrate its use by applying it to the genetics of intelligence and schizophrenia. The application to intelligence follows closely the analysis given in Jinks and Fulker (1970). Although a statistically superior and more direct method was used, the outcome was essentially the same. The analysis of schizophrenia represents a novel application of the approach.The biometrical genetic approach, as developed originally by Fisher (1918), involves partitioning the total observed variance of a trait into components reflecting the effects of an indefinite number of both genes and environmental influences. If we are concerned with human behavioral traits, the least number of effects required to be at all realistic is five. On the genetic side, we must allow for the effects of additive and dominant gene action and that of assortative mating, while on the environmental side we must allow for the effects of a common family or shared environment, as well as those environmental effects unique to the individual.