Owning vs. Renting: the benefits of residential stability?
Owning vs. Renting: the benefits of residential stability?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/02673037.2020.1823332
复制
发表时间：
2020-09-23
期刊：
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Acolin, Arthur
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Acolin, Arthur
在住房研究中，与租赁相比，拥有住房通常被认为更理想，并且与更好的结果相关。本文探讨了 25 个欧洲国家的业主和租户之间结果的差异，以及在业主和租户的居住稳定性水平更相似（租期长度差距更小的国家）中，这些差异是否系统性地更小。结果表明，不同国家的保有权类型和所选结果之间的关系方向基本相似。业主通常表现出更理想的结果（包括生活满意度、公民参与、儿童教育成果以及身心健康）。然而，当考察结果与国家层面任期长度差距差异之间的关系时，研究结果表明，在任期长度差距较小的国家，承租人的结果与业主更相似。这些结果表明了提高住宅稳定性的政策的潜在好处，特别是对于租房者而言。
In housing research, owning, as compared to renting, is generally depicted as more desirable and associated with better outcomes. This paper explores differences in outcomes between owners and renters in 25 European countries and whether these differences are systematically smaller in countries in which owners and renters have more similar levels of residential stability (smaller tenure length gap). The results indicate that the direction of the relationship between tenure type and the selected outcomes is largely similar across countries. Owners generally exhibit more desirable outcomes (including life satisfaction, civic participation, educational outcomes for children, and physical and mental health). However, when looking at the relationship between outcomes and country level differences in tenure length gap, findings suggest that renters have outcomes that are more similar to owners in countries in which tenure length gaps are smaller. These results point to the potential benefits of policies that would increase residential stability, particularly for renters.