A comparison of methane emission measurements using Eddy Covariance and manual and automated chamber-based techniques in Tibetan Plateau alpine wetland.
A comparison of methane emission measurements using Eddy Covariance and manual and automated chamber-based techniques in Tibetan Plateau alpine wetland.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.018
复制
发表时间:
2013-10
影响因子:
8.9
通讯作者:
Lingfei Yu;Hao Wang;Guangshuai Wang;Weimin Song;Yao Huang;Sheng Li;N. Liang;Yanhong Tang;Jinsheng He
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lingfei Yu;Hao Wang;Guangshuai Wang;Weimin Song;Yao Huang;Sheng Li;N. Liang;Yanhong Tang;Jinsheng He
Comparing of different CH4flux measurement techniques allows for the independent evaluation of the performance and reliability of those techniques. We compared three approaches, the traditional discrete Manual Static Chamber (MSC), Continuous Automated Chamber (CAC) and Eddy Covariance (EC) methods of measuring the CH4fluxes in an alpine wetland. We found a good agreement among the three methods in the seasonal CH4flux patterns, but the diurnal patterns from both the CAC and EC methods differed. While the diurnal CH4flux variation from the CAC method was positively correlated with the soil temperature, the diurnal variation from the EC method was closely correlated with the solar radiation and net CO2fluxes during the daytime but was correlated with the soil temperature at nighttime. The MSC method showed 25.3% and 7.6% greater CH4fluxes than the CAC and EC methods when measured between 09:00 h and 12:00 h, respectively.