A Pilot Validation Study of the Newborn Behavioral Observations System: Associations with Salivary Cortisol and Temperament.
A Pilot Validation Study of the Newborn Behavioral Observations System: Associations with Salivary Cortisol and Temperament.
复制标题
新生儿行为观察系统的试点验证研究:与唾液皮质醇和气质的关联。
DOI:
10.1097/dbp.0000000000000842
复制
发表时间:
2020-12
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Bush NR
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Congdon JL;Nugent JK;McManus BM;Coccia M;Bush NR
There are few standardized neonatal neurobehavioral instruments available for longitudinal child development research. We adapted the established clinical tool, the Newborn Behavioral Observations (NBO) system, for research by standardizing the administration protocol and expanding the three-point coding scale to five points. We administered the five-point NBO to 144 racially/ethnically diverse late-preterm or term infants born to low-income women (average age five weeks). Cronbach’s alphas were calculated to determine internal consistency reliability of Autonomic, Motor, Organization of State, and Responsivity subscales. We examined concurrent validity using subscale associations with infant salivary cortisol reactivity to the NBO and maternally reported infant temperament. Two of the four NBO subscales, Organization of State and Responsivity, had excellent (0.91) and good (0.76) reliability, respectively, and were retained for further analyses. Infants with higher Organization of State scores (more optimal regulation) demonstrated lower cortisol reactivity (r = −0.30, p < 0.01) and temperamental negativity (r = −0.16, p < 0.05). Responsivity was unrelated to cortisol reactivity or temperament. State regulation, as measured by the five-point NBO, was associated with a biologic marker of infant stress response to the NBO administration and reported temperament. Poor reliability of the NBO’s three-item Autonomic and seven-item Motor subscales suggests that further psychometric research in other samples, and likely refinement, are needed. Given the paucity of neurobehavioral assessment tools for infants, these findings justify such research as next steps in the incremental progression toward the development of a practical, reliable, and predictive measure of early neurobehavioral development.