Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing
Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/ageing/afl100
复制
发表时间：
2006-11-01
期刊：
影响因子：
6.7
通讯作者：
Iliffe, Steve
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bowling, Ann;Iliffe, Steve
工作背景：如何“成功地”变老以及就其定义达成共识的兴趣日益增加。目的：使用2000 - 1年英国老龄化纵向调查评估成功老龄化的不同模式。设置：英国社区设置。方法：在英国对999名65岁以上的人进行的横断面人口调查中测试了五种成功老龄化模式。这些模型是生物医学，更广泛的生物医学，社会，心理和奠定了基础。与未成功老化的受访者相比，被该模型归类为成功老化的受访者将其生活质量（QoL）评定为良好而不是不好的几率超过5倍[比值比（OR）= 5.493，95%置信区间（95%CI）= 2.655 - 11.364]。基于层，更多维，成功老龄化的模型预测感知生活质量比一维模型更有力，应用于评估老年人群的健康促进的结果。
Background: there is increasing interest in how to age 'successfully' and in reaching consensus over its definition.Objective: to assess different models of successful ageing, using a British longitudinal survey of ageing in 2000 - 1.Setting: community settings in Britain.Methods: five models of successful ageing were tested on a British cross-sectional population survey of 999 people aged 65+. The models were biomedical, broader biomedical, social, psychological and lay based.Results: the lay model emerged as the strongest. Respondents who were classified as successfully aged with this model, compared with those not successfully aged, had over five times the odds of rating their quality of life (QoL) as good rather than not good [odds ratio (OR) = 5.493, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 2.655 - 11.364].Conclusion: the lay-based, more multidimensional, model of successful ageing predicted perceived QoL more powerfully than unidimensional models and should be used to evaluate the outcomes of health promotion in older populations.