Methods to detect P-glycoprotein-associated multidrug resistance in patients' tumors: consensus recommendations.

Methods to detect P-glycoprotein-associated multidrug resistance in patients' tumors: consensus recommendations.
复制标题

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1996-07
期刊:
影响因子:
11.2
通讯作者:
William T. Beck;T. M. Grogan;C. Willman;C. Cordon-Cardo;D. Parham;J. Kuttesch;Michael Andreeff;S. Bates;Costan W. Berard;James M. Boyett;N. Brophy;H. Broxterman;H. Chan;William S. Dalton;M. Dietel;A. Fojo;Randy D. Gascoyne;D. Head;P. Houghton;D. K. Srivastava;Manfred Lehnert;Catherine P. Leith;E. Paietta;Z. Pavelic;L. Rimsza;I. Roninson;B. Sikic;P. Twentyman;R. Warnke;R. Weinstein
William T. Beck;T. M. Grogan;C. Willman;C. Cordon-Cardo;D. Parham;J. Kuttesch;Michael Andreeff;S. Bates;Costan W. Berard;James M. Boyett;N. Brophy;H. Broxterman;H. Chan;William S. Dalton;M. Dietel;A. Fojo;Randy D. Gascoyne;D. Head;P. Houghton;D. K. Srivastava;Manfred Lehnert;Catherine P. Leith;E. Paietta;Z. Pavelic;L. Rimsza;I. Roninson;B. Sikic;P. Twentyman;R. Warnke;R. Weinstein
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
William T. Beck;T. M. Grogan;C. Willman;C. Cordon-Cardo;D. Parham;J. Kuttesch;Michael Andreeff;S. Bates;Costan W. Berard;James M. Boyett;N. Brophy;H. Broxterman;H. Chan;William S. Dalton;M. Dietel;A. Fojo;Randy D. Gascoyne;D. Head;P. Houghton;D. K. Srivastava;Manfred Lehnert;Catherine P. Leith;E. Paietta;Z. Pavelic;L. Rimsza;I. Roninson;B. Sikic;P. Twentyman;R. Warnke;R. Weinstein

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

多药耐药(MDR),特别是与MDR1及其产物p -糖蛋白(Pgp)的过表达相关的多药耐药,被认为在一些人类肿瘤的治疗结果中起作用;然而,由于不同实验室发表的结果不同,很难达成一致的结论。影响临床标本中Pgp检测的因素很多,包括其低表达和异质性表达;检测终点定义冲突;样品制备、固定和分析方法的差异;使用具有不同Pgp特异性和亲和力和不同识别表位的免疫试剂;二次试剂和色素的使用;临床终点的差异。此外,Pgp过表达以外的机制也可能导致临床耐多药。这些因素的综合作用显然是重要的,特别是在Pgp低表达的肿瘤中。因此,在田纳西州孟菲斯市组织了一次研讨会,以促进临床标本中MDR1和Pgp检测方法的标准化。同意参与的15家北美和欧洲机构进行了三次研讨会前试验,这些试验采用了具有良好特征的MDR骨髓瘤和癌细胞系,这些细胞系表达了越来越多的Pgp。目的是为第四项试验建立标准材料和方法,在临床标本中测定Pgp和MDR1。从这些努力中得出的一般结论导致了对未来研究的一些建议:(a)尽管目前Pgp和MDR1的检测在白血病和淋巴瘤中可能比在实体瘤中更可靠,但在大多数情况下准确测量低水平的Pgp表达仍然是一个难以实现的目标;(b)组织特异性对照、抗体对照和标准化耐多药细胞系对于校准任何检测方法和后续临床样本分析至关重要;(c)使用两种或更多供应商标准化的抗Pgp抗体试剂来识别不同的表位,提高Pgp免疫检测的可靠性;(d)必须仔细控制样品固定和抗原保存;(e)多参数分析可用于MDR1/Pgp表达的临床检测;(f)免疫染色数据最好以染色强度和阳性细胞百分比报告;(g)分析的任意最小截止点损害了结论的可靠性。与会者提出的建议应提高Pgp在临床耐多药发展中的作用的研究质量,并为其他耐药相关蛋白的研究提供范例。
Multidrug resistance (MDR), especially that associated with overexpression of MDR1 and its product, P-glycoprotein (Pgp), is thought to play a role in the outcome of therapy for some human tumors; however, a consensus conclusion has been difficult to reach, owing to the variable results published by different laboratories. Many factors appear to influence the detection of Pgp in clinical specimens, including its low and heterogeneous expression; conflicting definitions of detection end points; differences in methods of sample preparation, fixation, and analysis; use of immunological reagents with variable Pgp specificity and avidity and with different recognition epitopes; use of secondary reagents and chromogens; and differences in clinical end points. Also, mechanisms other than Pgp overexpression may contribute to clinical MDR. The combined effect of these factors is clearly important, especially among tumors with low expression of Pgp. Thus, a workshop was organized in Memphis, Tennessee, to promote the standardization of approaches to MDR1 and Pgp detection in clinical specimens. The 15 North American and European institutions that agreed to participate conducted three preworkshop trials with well-characterized MDR myeloma and carcinoma cell lines that expressed increasing amounts of Pgp. The intent was to establish standard materials and methods for a fourth trial, assays of Pgp and MDR1 in clinical specimens. The general conclusions emerging from these efforts led to a number of recommendations for future studies: (a) although detection of Pgp and MDR1 is at present likely to be more reliable in leukemias and lymphomas than in solid tumors, accurate measurement of low levels of Pgp expression under most conditions remains an elusive goal; (b) tissue-specific controls, antibody controls, and standardized MDR cell lines are essential for calibrating any detection method and for subsequent analyses of clinical samples; (c) use of two or more vendor-standardized anti-Pgp antibody reagents that recognize different epitopes improves the reliability of immunological detection of Pgp; (d) sample fixation and antigen preservation must be carefully controlled; (e) multiparameter analysis is useful in clinical assays of MDR1/Pgp expression; (f) immunostaining data are best reported as staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells; and (g) arbitrary minimal cutoff points for analysis compromise the reliability of conclusions. The recommendations made by workshop participants should enhance the quality of research on the role of Pgp in clinical MDR development and provide a paradigm for investigations of other drug resistance-associated proteins.