Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan
Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00095-x
复制
发表时间：
1998-11-01
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Kurokawa, K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fukuhara, S;Bito, S;Kurokawa, K
日本SF-36的开发分两个阶段完成：第二阶段日本版本1.1是根据国际生活质量评估（IQOLA）项目指南制作的，但一些心理测量测试的结果是出乎意料的。首先，身体功能项目的得分变化不大。其次，使用因素分析，我们不能清楚地区分尺度设计来衡量“身体”的组成部分的生活质量，那些设计来衡量“精神”的组成部分。第二阶段：焦点小组讨论显示，有限的往往被解释为有限的医生。因此，很难做到的是使用（版本1.2）。两次调查的结果表明，版本1.2产生的分数是可靠的内部一致性和重测标准，并产生两个主成分。然而，在日本，一些尺度和主成分之间的相关性模式与美国不同。在日本SF-36的发展过程中，定性和定量方法的反复使用非常重要。(C)1998年爱思唯尔科学公司
Development of the Japanese SF-36 was completed in two phases: Phase ii Japanese version 1.1 was produced according to International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project guidelines, but some results of psychometric tests were unexpected. First, scores varied little across physical-functioning items. Second, using factor analysis, we could not clearly distinguish the scales designed to measure the "physical" component of quality of life from those designed to measure the "mental" component. Phase 2: Focus-group discussions revealed that limited had often been interpreted as limited by a doctor. Therefore, is difficult to do was used instead (version 1.2). Results of two surveys indicated that version 1.2 yields scores that are reliable by internal consistency and test-retest standards and yields two principal components. In Japan, however,the pattern of correlations between some scales and the principal components differs from that in the United States. Iterative use of qualitative and quantitative methods was very important in developing the Japanese SF-36. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.