Response to the commentary letter entitled 'Diagnostic radiography and thyroid cancer - causation or simply an association?' to our article entitled 'Diagnostic radiography exposure increases the risk for thyroid microcarcinoma: a population-based case-co
Response to the commentary letter entitled 'Diagnostic radiography and thyroid cancer - causation or simply an association?' to our article entitled 'Diagnostic radiography exposure increases the risk for thyroid microcarcinoma: a population-based case-co
复制标题
对题为“放射诊断与甲状腺癌——因果关系还是简单的关联?”的评论信的回应
DOI:
10.1097/cej.0000000000000206
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Udelsman,Robert
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhang,Yawei;Huang,Huang;Sandler,Jason;Udelsman,Robert
Recall bias could have a significant impact on the results generated from a case–control study if there were no precautious strategies being exercised during the implementation of the study. In our study, the interviewers were blinded to the study hypothesis, and the questionnaire also included questions on other exposures such as lifestyle, medical history, occupation, and diet. We value and appreciate the suggestion by Dr Wiltshire and Dr Balasubramanian that including ‘random/unrelated’questions in the questionnaire, such as questions about ultrasound and MRI scans, would be helpful in estimating the extent of recall bias for the sake of future studies.Although the recall bias cannot be quantified per se, because of the lack of knowledge about the ‘true’association between exposure and outcome, the direction of bias can often be discerned. In our study, the positive findings were only limited to thyroid microcarcinoma, supporting the notion that differential recall bias was less likely to play a major role in our study. Therefore, the potential recall bias was likely to be nondifferential, which biased the results toward null.