Impulsivity, Procrastination, and Performance
Impulsivity, Procrastination, and Performance
复制标题
冲动、拖延和绩效
DOI：
10.11207/taaos.7.2_179
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
長瀬 勝彦
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
伴 正隆;本橋 永至;長谷川 翔平;豊澤 栄治;佐藤 忠彦;里村 卓也;照井 伸彦;里村卓也;山崎修嗣;松田 修;松田 修;吉田 洋;松田修;松田修;吉田洋;吉田洋;松田修;吉田洋;松田修;吉田洋;吉田洋・松田修;伊藤徳正・松田修;吉田洋;吉田 洋;松田 修;吉田 洋;松田修;吉田 洋;長瀬勝彦;松井亮太・長瀬勝彦;長瀬勝彦;長瀬勝彦;千田康介・長瀬勝彦;長瀬勝彦;長瀬勝彦;長瀬 勝彦
以往关于心理特质与拖延之间关系的研究结果并不一致。拖延和表现之间的关系也是如此。一些研究者报告了拖延对绩效的负面影响，一些研究者报告了拖延对绩效的正面影响，而另一些研究者则报告说没有影响。部分原因是，以前的研究只探讨了这两种关系中的每一种。此外，心理特征和表现之间的关系仍然隐藏在视野之外。为了克服这些局限性，本研究探讨了心理特质、拖延和绩效之间的关系。Steel（2011）提出了一个拖延量表和三个心理特质量表（期望，价值和冲动）。我将它们翻译成日语，并做了一些适度的修改，以提高对日本学生的适用性。被调查者为东京某大学的160名在校生（82名女性，78名男性）。学生们回答了问卷，并描述了他们的GPA，这是用来作为他们的学习成绩的指标。结构方程模型（SEM）显示，冲动行为的拖延和拖延行为的表现。期望和价值对拖延没有显著影响。心理特质对成绩无显著的直接影响。模型拟合统计表明CFI=。864，GFI=. 806和RMSEA=。058.
Previous findings on the relationship between psychological traits and procrastination are inconsistent. Same applies to the relationship between procrastination and performance. Some researchers have reported negative influences of procrastination on performance, some researchers have reported positive influences, and the others have reported no influences. It is partly due to the fact that prior research has explored only each of the two relationships. Additionally, the relationship between psychological traits and performance remains hidden from view. In order to overcome these limitations, this study investigates the relationships among psychological traits, procrastination, and performance. Steel (2011) presented a scale of procrastination and scales of three psychological traits (expectation, value, and impulsivity). I translated them into Japanese language and made some modest amendments in order to improve the suitability for Japanese students. Respondents were 160 sophomores (82 females, 78 males) of a university in Tokyo. Students answered the questionnaires and described their GPAs, which were used as the indicators of their academic performance. Structural equation modelling (SEM) revealed that impulsivity acted on procrastination and that procrastination acted on performance. Expectation and value did not have significant influences on procrastination. None of the psychological traits had significant direct influences on performance. The model fit statistics indicated CFI=. 864, GFI=. 806, and RMSEA=. 058.