Parables in the Q Document

Q文档中的寓言

• 批准号: 162011301
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Ruben Zimmermann
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Seminar für Neues Testament
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2010
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2009-12-31 至 2016-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/162011301?language=en
• 关键词: Parables; Document

This application is for an extension of a current project. The following reasons support continuing the present research:1) The issue of the text of Q remains an unsolved and central problem. Simply utilizing the Critical Edition of Q in scholarly endeavors is not sufficient as seen, e.g., through the thought experiment of attempting to reconstruct the text of Mark in triple tradition parables from the text of those parables in Matthew and Luke. Significant differences in wording reveal that, at least as far as the parables are concerned, the traditional approach to reconstructing Q through source criticism should be abandoned.2) Methodological questions: Central questions include: Is it possible to avoid the weaknesses of Q-reconstructions while at the same time continuing to embrace the Q-hypothesis and a (written) text of Q? What contribution can literary criticism make to Q scholarship? The double tradition (Matt/Luke) can be considered more precisely through an intertextual methodology. In the parables the foundational metaphorical and narratival characteristics are to be taken up and considered (e.g., metaphors/images and plot structures/characters retain a certain stability even when the wording is significantly different).3) Expansion of the passages considered: In addition to the parables of Jesus listed in the Kompendium der Gleichnisse Jesus, there are verses spoken by John the Baptist and the Centurion in Capernaum that can and should be recognized as parables. 4) Significant interest in professional circles: Invitations to conferences, themes taken up in the SBL Q-section, and an international conference in Mainz have encouraged a broader and more extensive study of the topic. It is to be expected that the approach will provide significant stimuli for Q scholarship.5) Qualified wiss. Mitarbeiter: The applicant has been able to secure Dr. Dieter T. Roth as wiss. Mitarbeiter for the project. As a bilingual scholar (German-American), he is the ideal candidate for this project since it requires intensive interaction with English-language scholarship. Furthermore, his doctoral work on the text of Marcion`s Gospel provided experience in working with secondarily attested texts leading to a carefully constructed and methodologically sophisticated approach to work on Q. His goal is to write a monograph that can also be submitted as a Habilitationsschrift.6) Expansion of the project team: Arne Bork, a doctoral student with an externally funded scholarship, is interested in the broader scope of the project through applying the methodology to other aspects of Q (i.e., character analysis). Contact and interaction between this work and the project creates a synergy effect.Extending the funding for this project would allow for a finer differentiation of the methods of Q-analysis, an application of the methods to all Q parables, and an in-depth presentation of the results in the first monograph dedicated to the Q-Parables.

此申请是为了延长当前项目。本文的研究有以下几个方面的原因：（1）《Q》的文本问题是一个尚未解决的核心问题。简单地利用Q的批判版在学术努力是不够的，如所见，例如，通过思想实验，试图从马太福音和路加福音的比喻中，重建三重传统比喻中的马可福音。在措辞上的显著差异表明，至少就寓言而言，应该放弃传统的通过源批评重建Q的方法。2）方法论问题：核心问题包括：是否有可能避免Q重建的弱点，同时继续接受Q假设和Q的（书面）文本？文学批评能为Q学做出什么贡献？双重传统（马特/路加）可以通过互文性的方法更准确地考虑。在比喻中，基本的隐喻和叙事特征将被接受和考虑（例如，比喻/图像和情节结构/人物保持一定的稳定性，即使在措辞明显不同的情况下）。3）所考虑的段落的扩展：除了列在Kompendium der Gleichnisse Jesus中的耶稣比喻外，还有施洗约翰和百夫长在迦百农所说的诗句，可以而且应该被认为是比喻。4)专业界的重大兴趣：会议邀请，在SBL Q-部分采取的主题，并在美因茨的国际会议鼓励了更广泛和更广泛的研究主题。可以预期，这种方法将为Q值提供重要的刺激。Mitarbeiter：申请人已经能够确保博士。罗斯是个智者Mitarbeiter的项目。作为一名双语学者（德裔美国人），他是这个项目的理想人选，因为它需要与英语语言奖学金进行密集的互动。此外，他的博士工作的文本马吉安的福音提供了经验，在工作中与次要证明文本导致一个精心构建和方法论复杂的方法来工作Q。他的目标是写一本专著，也可以作为Habilitationsschrift提交。6）项目团队的扩大：阿恩博尔克，一位拥有外部资助奖学金的博士生，对通过将方法论应用于Q的其他方面来扩大项目的范围感兴趣（iidoEe，性格分析）。这项工作和该项目之间的联系和互动产生了协同效应。扩大对该项目的资助将允许Q分析方法的更精细区分，将这些方法应用于所有Q比喻，并在第一本专门针对Q比喻的专著中深入介绍结果。