Workshop: Qualitative Transparency Deliberations Working Groups

研讨会：定性透明度审议工作组

• 批准号: 1644757
• 负责人: Tim Buthe
• 金额: $ 4.67万
• 依托单位: Duke University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2016
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2016-09-01 至 2017-08-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1644757&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Workshop; Qualitative; Transparency; Deliberations; Working

General SummaryThe aim of the proposed workshop is to develop Community Transparency Statements to articulate the (possibly multiple) understandings of research transparency shared among scholars undertaking specific types of qualitative research. This workshop addresses many concerns raised by the Political Science discipline's Data Access and Research Transparency initiative. The increasing push for greater research transparency raised a number of questions about how best to achieve transparency in qualitative research. The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations will allow qualitative political scientists from a wide range of research traditions to address open questions about qualitative research transparency through a process of consultation, deliberation, and reporting of insights to the profession at large. Participants will be drawn from the Qualitative and Multi-Methods Research section (QMMR) of the American Political Science Association. Technical SummaryThe aim of the proposed workshop is to develop Community Transparency Statements to articulate the (possibly multiple) understandings of research transparency shared among scholars undertaking specific types of qualitative research. Workshop participants will be drawn from the Qualitative and Multi-Methods Research (QMMR) section of the American Political Science Association. These qualitative scholars have broad knowledge of this research area and provide guidance to the broader political-science community concerning qualitative research and transparency issues. Community transparency statements are the main intended output of the qualitative transparency deliberation (QTD) process. This workshop will benefit both scholars and the public at large in that it contributes to increasing the credibility of scientific research. The workshop provides information and shared standards to inform concerns about ways to balance transparency with the protection of human subjects. The community transparency statement will also help political-science journal editors in making decisions about transparency policies as related to qualitative research.

建议研讨会的目的是制定社区透明度声明，以阐明从事特定类型定性研究的学者之间对研究透明度的（可能多种）理解。本次研讨会解决了政治学学科的数据访问和研究透明度倡议提出的许多问题。越来越多地推动更大的研究透明度提出了一些关于如何最好地实现定性研究透明度的问题。定性透明度审议将允许来自广泛研究传统的定性政治科学家通过咨询、审议和向整个行业报告见解的过程来解决有关定性研究透明度的开放性问题。参与者将从美国政治科学协会的定性和多方法研究部（QMMR）中抽取。技术摘要本次研讨会的目的是制定社区透明度声明，以阐明从事特定类型定性研究的学者之间对研究透明度的（可能多种）理解。研讨会参与者将来自美国政治科学协会的定性和多方法研究（QMMR）部门。这些定性学者对这一研究领域有广泛的了解，并为更广泛的政治学社区提供有关定性研究和透明度问题的指导。社区透明度声明是定性透明度审议（QTD）过程的主要预期输出。这次研讨会将有利于学者和广大公众，因为它有助于提高科学研究的可信度。讲习班提供信息和共享标准，告知人们对如何平衡透明度与保护人类受试者的关切。社区透明度声明还将帮助政治学期刊编辑制定与定性研究相关的透明度政策。