课题基金 / 基金详情

RAPID: Collaborative Research: Social Distancing During Pandemics: Developing Methods to Balance Affiliation and Disease-Avoidance Motivations

RAPID: Collaborative Research: Social Distancing During Pandemics: Developing Methods to Balance Affiliation and Disease-Avoidance Motivations
RAPID:合作研究:大流行期间的社交距离:制定平衡归属感和疾病避免动机的方法
批准号:
2030914
负责人:
Donald Sacco
金额:
$4.34万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2020
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2020-05-15 至 2021-07-31

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
人们有强烈的相互交流的需求。他们也有强烈的愿望,以避免疾病。 保持社交距离是阻止疾病传播的主要行为方法。 然而,社会距离违背了社会互动的自然愿望。这些双重动机之间的紧张关系可能会导致心理困扰,并可能导致人们在努力缓解压力和孤独时违反面对面接触的限制。这对于那些无法获得高度沉浸式虚拟社交形式的人来说尤其可能,例如基于互联网的视频通话,让人们看到朋友和家人。它也可能更经常地适用于老年人(他们最容易受到COVID-19的影响),因为他们对基于技术的互动平台不太熟悉。 通过更好地了解人们如何解决与他人互动的需要和避免疾病的愿望之间的紧张关系,该项目将为旨在遏制疾病传播的公共卫生干预措施的发展提供信息。该项目将联系的需要与避免疾病的愿望进行对比。 一个目的是为制定旨在避免孤独同时保持社交距离的干预措施提供信息。 研究1收集了同一参与者在多天内的数据。将收集孤独感、对感染疾病的担忧以及社交互动的数量和类型的测量结果。该研究测试了一个假设,即参与者对虚拟社交互动的访问有限(例如,那些经济能力有限的人,老年人)将感到最孤独,并报告对疾病的担忧减少,这将与更频繁的违反社交距离行为有关。研究2实验性地操纵了包容与排斥的感觉,以测试社会孤立的影响和对感染疾病的担忧。 这两项研究都是基于美国居民的大量代表性样本,以确保研究结果适用于该国不同的年龄范围,地理区域和社会经济群体。 该研究阐明了各种心理过程如何相互作用并最终影响社会行为。 这项研究进一步调查了人们如何在不牺牲安全的情况下安全地满足他们的加入动机。 长期目标是为制定干预措施提供信息,这些干预措施可能会在当前和未来的流行病期间促进适当的行为反应。该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命,并通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估,被认为值得支持。
英文摘要
People have a powerful need to interact with each other. They also have strong desires to avoid disease. Social distancing is the primary behavioral method to stop disease from spreading. Yet, social distancing goes against the natural desire for social interactions. The tension between those dual motives can cause psychological distress, and may lead people to violate restrictions on face-to-face contact in their effort to relieve stress and loneliness. This is especially likely for people who do not have access to highly immersive forms of virtual socialization, such as internet-based video calls that let people see friends and family. It may also apply more often for older adults (who are most vulnerable to COVID-19) because of less familiarity with technology-based interaction platforms. By better understanding how people resolve the tension between the need to interact with others and the desire to avoid disease, this project will inform the development of public health interventions aimed at curbing the spread of disease.This project contrasts the need to affiliate with the desire to avoid disease. One aim is to inform the development of interventions designed to avoid loneliness while engaging in social distancing. Study 1 collects data from the same participants across multiple days. Measures of loneliness, concerns with contracting an illness, and amounts and types of social interactions will be collected. The research tests the hypothesis that participants with limited access to virtual social interactions (e.g., those with limited financial means, the elderly) will feel most lonely and report decreased concerns about disease, which will be associated with more frequent violations of social distancing behaviors. Study 2 experimentally manipulates feelings of inclusion versus exclusion to test for effects of social isolation and for the concern of contracting the disease. Both studies are based on large and representative samples of U.S. residents to ensure the findings are applicable across different age ranges, geographical regions, and socioeconomic groups within the country. The research elucidates how various psychological processes work against each other and in interaction to ultimately influence social behavior. The research further investigates how people can safely satisfy their motives to affiliate without sacrificing safety. The long-term goal is to inform the development of interventions that may be developed to promote appropriate behavioral responses during the current and future pandemics.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
期刊论文(2)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12597
发表时间: 2021-04
期刊: Social and Personality Psychology Compass
影响因子: 4.6
作者: [Steven G. Young;Mitch Brown;D. Sacco]
通讯作者: Steven G. Young;Mitch Brown;D. Sacco
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106892
发表时间: 2021-10
期刊: Computers in human behavior
影响因子: 9.9
作者: [Brown M, Young SG, Sacco DF]
通讯作者: Sacco DF
海外基金