'I would prefer not to'. Organ donation between unease and criticism. A sociological and ethical analysis.

“我宁愿不这样做”。

• 批准号: 252341816
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Frank Adloff
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2014
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2013-12-31 至 2019-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/252341816?language=en
• 关键词: would; prefer; Organ; donation; between

The project is a sequel to the project I would prefer not to. Organ donation between unease and criticism. In the first stage, the motives of skeptics of organ donation as well as of the undecided were examined along with the posters of German organ donation campaigns of the past 20 years. The main results highlight four types of criticism which are not directly linked to the recent events in the transplantation system. However, they also highlight six different moral messages in the posters that are historically associated with important events and disruptions in the transplantation system. These results indicate that specific positions and aspects are excluded both in the public discourse and in health policy.In the second stage, strategies of the public discourse and of health communication which systematically exclude positions are to be reconstructed as well as their consequences for the critics. Moreover, these strategies of exclusion should be reflected normatively for the development of ideas concerning concrete discursive inclusion of positions that are currently being declassified as irrational.The sociological project will, from a theoretical perspective, question how the arguments of these seemingly irrational positions can be understood as well-founded arguments. In addition, the project will analyse the strategies that exclude these positions in daily life as well as in health policy and the academic discourse.Particularly, the one-sidedness of the analysed campaigns illustrates the conflict of interest of the Transplantation Act. On the one hand, institutions of health policy have to inform neutrally about the topic in order to allow a self-determined decision. On the other hand, organ donation should be promoted to increase the number of transplants. Accordingly, the bioethical subproject questions how a normative concept of public health communication can be designed to achieve a reflective balance between individual self-determination and the collective interest in organ transplants. Therefore, the analysis aims at critically addressing the question of what comprises good information in such a sensitive field. Moreover, the personal attitudes and moral convictions for and against organ transplantation are to be better understood.By developing socio-theoretical and normative approaches, both subprojects aim at a critical analysis of the high symbolic value of organ transplantation for the self-conception of modern high-tech medicine.

该项目是我不希望不这样做的项目的续集。不安与批评之间的器官捐赠。在第一阶段，研究了器官捐赠的怀疑论者以及未定的动机，以及过去20年中德国器官捐赠运动的海报。主要结果突出了四种类型的批评，这些批评与移植系统中最近事件没有直接相关。但是，他们还强调了海报中六个不同的道德信息，这些信息与移植系统中的重要事件和中断有关。这些结果表明，在公共话语和卫生政策中都排除了特定的立场和方面。在第二阶段，公共话语和卫生交流的策略和健康沟通的策略将被系统排除在职位上，及其对批评者的后果。此外，这些排斥策略应规范性地反映出有关混凝土话语的思想，​​包括目前被解释为不合理的立场。从理论的角度来看，社会学项目将质疑这些看似非理性立场的论点如何被理解为基础的参数。此外，该项目将分析在日常生活以及卫生政策和学术话语中排除这些立场的策略。尤其是，分析运动的单面性说明了《移植法》的利益冲突。一方面，卫生政策机构必须中立地告知该主题，以便允许做出自决的决定。另一方面，应促进器官捐赠以增加移植数量。因此，生物伦理的副本质疑公共卫生沟通的规范概念如何设计旨在在个人自决和器官移植中的集体兴趣之间取得反思平衡。因此，该分析旨在批判性地解决什么构成了这样敏感领域中良好信息的问题。此外，要更好地理解对人体移植和反对器官移植的个人态度和道德信念。通过开发社会理论和规范方法，这两种副本旨在对机器人器官移植的高象征性价值进行批判性分析，以实现对现代高科技医学的自我构度的高度分析。