课题基金 / 基金详情

Fostering More Accurate and Identity-Affirming Science Teaching and Learning at Hispanic-Serving Institutions

Fostering More Accurate and Identity-Affirming Science Teaching and Learning at Hispanic-Serving Institutions
在西班牙裔服务机构中促进更准确和身份肯定的科学教学
批准号:
2234633
负责人:
Antonio Duran
金额:
$9.2万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2023
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2023-06-01 至 2026-05-31

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
该项目旨在通过增加和多样化STEM和医疗保健人力资源,为国家利益服务,配备具有准确和身份确认的科学知识和经验的个人。来自科罗拉多州立大学、佛罗里达国际大学和亚利桑那州立大学的教师团队将调查“中立”规范(即不承认社会身份和社会背景对科学的作用或科学对社会的作用)如何影响西班牙裔服务机构(HSIs)的本科科学教学,一些教师如何打破这一规范来教授肯定身份的内容,以及这种变化如何影响学生。hsi的这项工作很重要,因为越来越多的人对hsi的教育工作者如何有意地服务,而不是简单地招收来自少数族裔背景的学生,并在西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区中照顾不同的亚群体感兴趣。了解如何支持教师打破“中立”的规范,应该为具有各种身份的学生创造更受欢迎的环境,并增加学生对STEM的归属感、兴趣和保留。该项目计划在五个卫生研究所采用混合方法(访谈和调查),多地点案例研究方法。三个目标指导项目的执行。首先是描述hsi的本科生物学讲师如何决定是否以及如何在他们的课程中包括身份确认内容,以及影响这些决定的各种因素。第二是确定生物中的身份确认内容如何影响学生的体验,如归属感、对生物内容的兴趣和感知内容的相关性。第三个目标是开发一种调查工具,以捕捉学生对hsi不同教师生物教学方法的普遍看法。项目团队将特别关注教师在生物课上使用身份中立或身份肯定的内容,以及这类内容对少数身份学生的影响。这个项目采用了一种新颖的研究方法,通过检查教师在内容和教学方面的决定,一种更全面的方法来理解教师如何创造认同环境。这个项目应该促进对教师如何在hsi的背景下决定他们的教学法和课程内容的理解。NSF IUSE: EDU项目支持研究和开发项目,以提高所有学生STEM教育的有效性。通过其参与学生学习轨道,该计划支持有前途的实践和工具的创建,探索和实施。该奖项反映了美国国家科学基金会的法定使命,并通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估,被认为值得支持。
英文摘要
This project aims to serve the national interest by increasing and diversifying the STEM and healthcare workforce with individuals equipped with accurate and identity-affirming scientific knowledge and experiences. A team of faculty from Colorado State University, Florida International University, and Arizona State University will investigate how the norm of “neutrality” (i.e., not acknowledging the role of social identities and social contexts on science or the role of science on society) impacts undergraduate science teaching at Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs), how some instructors break free of this norm to teach identify-affirming content, and how this change impacts students. This work at HSIs is important because of the growing interest in how educators within HSIs are intentionally serving, rather than simply enrolling, students from minoritized backgrounds and attending to different subgroups within Hispanic/Latinx communities. Understanding how to support instructors to break with the norm of “neutrality” should create more welcoming environments for students with a range of identities and increase student belongingness, interest, and retention in STEM.This project plans to employ a mixed methods (interviews and surveys), multi-site case study approach at five HSIs. Three goals guide the execution of the project. The first is to characterize how undergraduate biology instructors at HSIs make decisions about if and how to include identity-affirming content in their courses and the various factors that influence these decisions. Second is to establish how identity-affirming content in biology impacts student experiences, such as belongingness, interest in biology content, and perceived content relevance. The third goal is to develop a survey instrument to capture student perceptions of the prevalence of different instructor approaches to biology instruction at HSIs. The project team will specifically focus on instructors’ use of identity-neutral or identity-affirming content in biology classes, and the impact this type of content has on students with minoritized identities. This project takes a novel research approach by examining instructors’ decisions regarding both content and pedagogy, a more holistic approach to understanding how instructors create identity-affirming environments. This project should advance understanding of how instructors make decisions about their pedagogy and course content in the context of HSIs. The NSF IUSE: EDU Program supports research and development projects to improve the effectiveness of STEM education for all students. Through its Engaged Student Learning track, the program supports the creation, exploration, and implementation of promising practices and tools.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金