Collaborative Research: RUI: Trust but Verify: The Use of Intuition in Engineering Problem Solving

合作研究：RUI：信任但验证：直觉在工程问题解决中的运用

• 批准号: 2325524
• 负责人: Adam Carberry
• 金额: $ 21.15万
• 依托单位: Arizona State University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2023
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2023-10-01 至 2026-09-30
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2325524&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Collaborative; Research; RUI; Trust; but

The project, “Collaborative Research: RUI: Trust but Verify: The Use of Intuition in Engineering Problem Solving” is a three-year study about engineering intuition conducted at Bucknell University, Arizona State University, and Embry Riddle Aeronautical University. The goal of this project is to examine the application of intuition by engineering practitioners and generate knowledge that promotes the professional formation of engineers and development of a stronger engineering workforce. Engineering intuition is a problem-solving skill developed through experience that engineering practitioners subconsciously use when under pressure from constraints (e.g., lack of time). Engineering practitioners regularly use and develop intuition on-the-job; however, the use of intuition is often discouraged in undergraduate education. Research questions in this study focus on the application of intuition in engineering problem solving, solving “ill” versus “well” structured engineering problems, and prior engineering experience levels when engineers solve structured problems. The study will use a variety of methods and techniques (such as Simulation Interviews). New engineering practitioners (senior undergraduates and those with less than one year of experience) and mid-career practitioners (6-10 years of experience) will participate. The knowledge generated from this study will provide a foundation for bridging the disconnect between classroom and real-world engineering practices, designing educational interventions that promote intuition development, and understanding how early intuition development can help level the playing field for all students regardless of individual background, including past engineering experiences.The project, “Collaborative Research: RUI: Trust but Verify: The Use of Intuition in Engineering Problem Solving” is a three-year study about engineering intuition conducted at Bucknell University, Arizona State University, and Embry Riddle Aeronautical University. The goal of this project is to examine the application of intuition by engineering practitioners and generate knowledge that promotes the professional formation of engineers and development of a stronger engineering workforce. Engineering intuition is a problem-solving skill developed through experience that engineering practitioners subconsciously use when under pressure from constraints (e.g., lack of time). Expertise in a specific area is a prerequisite of intuition and is a defining characteristic of the expert. Engineering practitioners regularly use and develop intuition on-the-job; however, the use of intuition is often discouraged in undergraduate education. The disconnect between intuition’s use in engineering practice and in engineering education, coupled with limited knowledge of the relationship between intuition, expertise, and experience, presents an important gap in our existing understanding of engineering problem solving and future workforce preparation. A qualitative approach will be employed to investigate four research questions: RQ1: How does the application of intuition manifest in engineering problem solving? RQ2: How does the application of intuition vary when approaching “ill” versus “well” structured engineering problems? RQ3: How does the domain of practitioner expertise influence the application of intuition when approaching “ill” versus “well” structured engineering problems? RQ4: How does prior engineering experience influence the application of intuition when approaching “ill” versus “well” structured engineering problems? Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) will elicit expert knowledge from a sample of new engineering practitioners (senior undergraduates and those with less than one year of experience) and mid-career practitioners (6-10 years of experience). Per best practices, CTA methods (Simulation Interviews, Critical Decision Method, and Knowledge Audit Method) will be used to support robust data collection. The knowledge generated from this study will provide a foundation for bridging the disconnect between classroom and real-world engineering practices, designing educational interventions that promote intuition development, and understanding how early intuition development can help level the playing field for all students regardless of individual background, including past engineering experiences.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

该项目名为“协作研究：RUI：信任但验证：直觉在工程问题解决中的运用”，是一项为期三年的关于工程直觉的研究，在巴克内尔大学、亚利桑那州立大学和安柏里德尔航空大学进行。该项目的目标是检验工程从业者对直觉的应用，并产生促进工程师专业形成和发展更强大的工程队伍的知识。工程直觉是一种通过经验发展起来的解决问题的技能，工程从业者在受到限制（例如缺乏时间）的压力时下意识地使用这种技能。工程从业者经常在工作中运用和发展直觉；然而，本科教育中常常不鼓励使用直觉。本研究中的研究问题侧重于直觉在工程问题解决中的应用、解决“不良”与“良好”结构化工程问题以及工程师解决结构化问题时的先前工程经验水平。该研究将使用多种方法和技术（例如模拟访谈）。新工程从业者（高年级本科生和一年以下经验的人）和职业中期从业者（6-10年经验）将参加。这项研究产生的知识将为弥合课堂和现实世界工程实践之间的脱节、设计促进直觉发展的教育干预措施以及了解早期直觉发展如何帮助为所有学生提供公平的竞争环境（无论个人背景如何，包括过去的工程经验）奠定基础。该项目“协作研究：RUI：信任但验证：直觉在工程问题解决中的运用”是一项为期三年的关于工程直觉的研究 在巴克内尔大学、亚利桑那州立大学和安柏里德尔航空大学进行。该项目的目标是检验工程从业者对直觉的应用，并产生促进工程师专业形成和发展更强大的工程队伍的知识。工程直觉是一种通过经验发展起来的解决问题的技能，工程从业者在受到限制（例如缺乏时间）的压力时下意识地使用这种技能。特定领域的专业知识是直觉的先决条件，也是专家的决定性特征。工程从业者经常在工作中运用和发展直觉；然而，本科教育中常常不鼓励使用直觉。直觉在工程实践和工程教育中的使用之间的脱节，加上对直觉、专业知识和经验之间关系的有限了解，使我们对工程问题解决和未来劳动力准备的现有理解存在重大差距。将采用定性方法来调查四个研究问题： RQ1：直觉的应用在工程问题解决中如何体现？ RQ2：在处理“不良”和“良好”结构的工程问题时，直觉的应用有何不同？ RQ3：在处理“不良”与“良好”结构的工程问题时，从业者的专业知识领域如何影响直觉的应用？ RQ4：在处理“不良”与“良好”结构的工程问题时，先前的工程经验如何影响直觉的应用？认知任务分析 (CTA) 将从新工程从业者（高年级本科生和经验不足一年的人）和职业中期从业者（6-10 年经验）样本中获取专业知识。根据最佳实践，CTA 方法（模拟访谈、关键决策方法和知识审核方法）将用于支持可靠的数据收集。这项研究产生的知识将为弥合课堂和现实世界工程实践之间的脱节、设计促进直觉发展的教育干预措施以及了解早期直觉发展如何帮助为所有学生提供公平的竞争环境（无论个人背景如何，包括过去的工程经验）奠定基础。该奖项反映了 NSF 的法定使命，并通过使用基金会的智力价值和更广泛的影响审查进行评估，被认为值得支持。 标准。