The Absolute and the Concept of Difference: The Discourse between Schelling and Hegel 1794-1842

绝对与差异概念：谢林与黑格尔1794-1842年的论述

• 批准号: 259641004
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Philipp Schwab
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Philosophisches Seminar
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Independent Junior Research Groups
• 财政年份: 2015
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2014-12-31 至 2021-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/259641004?language=en
• 关键词: Absolute; Concept; Difference; Discourse; between

The aim of the Emmy Noether junior research group, for which an extension application is made, is to, for the first time, reconstruct the dispute between F.W.J. Schelling and G.W.F. Hegel, spanning almost fifty years, comprehensively and from a specific systematic point of view. In an historical perspective, the project reconstructs the development of the debate between the two thinkers chronologically in its central steps. Thereby, the project tries to show that the debate, in spite of all the polemics between the two thinkers, is at bottom a productive and reciprocal dialogue, which takes place as a complex interplay of appropriation and taking distance. From a systematic perspective, the debate is reconstructed as a 'dispute about difference'. In doing so, the various conceptions of difference as developed in the course of the discussion (e.g. quantitative difference subordinate to identity, internal relational-dynamic difference, external alterity, etc.) are analyzed and discussed in a typology of idealistic forms of difference. The project work to date has been chronologically based on the progress of the dialogue in five steps, successively reconstructing the respective interactions between Schelling and Hegel as well as the conceptions of difference that are expressed in this process. In the sixth step requested here, two new questions are to be pursued based on this, which have arisen as desiderata from the project work, in the sense of transversal questions across the entire dialogue. a) On the one hand, the chronology of the mutual depictions of Schelling and Hegel in their lectures on (above all) the history of philosophy will be reconstructed. The well-known and influential text versions of the respective lectures on "History of Philosophy" were edited posthumously from the thinkers’ estate (by K.L. Michelet and by K.F.A. Schelling) and are of questionable authenticity. The project will reconstruct a much more differentiated picture of these mutual representations, mostly based on students’ notes (Nachschriften), also inquiring changes in the mutual presentations. b) On the other hand, the debate is to be examined with a view to a 'dispute about method'. After Hegel's death, Schelling publicly accuses him of having appropriated the method of his (Schelling's) earlier system, but at the same time improperly transformed it. Conversely, in Hegel's lectures, we find the accusation that Schelling was completely lacking a method. The project will reconstruct the different methodological approaches involved in this debate and discuss them, in a comparative manner. The main thesis is that the divergence in the question of method may precisely be explained based on the conceptions of difference that were reconstructed in the previous steps of the project.

艾美·诺特 (Emmy Noether) 初级研究小组提出延期申请，其目的是首次重构 F.W.J. 之间的争议。谢林和 G.W.F.黑格尔，跨越近五十年，全面地、从具体系统的角度。从历史的角度来看，该项目按照时间顺序重构了两位思想家之间争论的核心步骤的发展。因此，该项目试图表明，尽管两位思想家之间存在所有争论，但这场辩论本质上是一种富有成效的、互惠的对话，它是作为挪用和拉开距离的复杂相互作用而发生的。从系统的角度来看，这场争论被重构为“差异之争”。在此过程中，在讨论过程中发展起来的各种差异概念（例如，从属于同一性的数量差异、内部关系-动态差异、外部相异性等）在理想主义差异形式的类型学中进行了分析和讨论。迄今为止的项目工作按照时间顺序分五个步骤进行对话，依次重构了谢林与黑格尔各自的互动以及这一过程中所表达的差异概念。在此要求的第六步中，将在此基础上提出两个新问题，这两个问题是项目工作中迫切需要解决的问题，即贯穿整个对话的横向问题。 a）一方面，谢林和黑格尔在（首先）哲学史讲座中相互描述的时间顺序将被重建。关于“哲学史”的各个讲座的著名且有影响力的文本版本是在思想家去世后（由 K.L. 米什莱和 K.F.A. 谢林）编辑的，其真实性值得怀疑。该项目将重建这些相互表征的更加差异化的图像，主要基于学生的笔记（Nachschriften），同时也会询问相互演示的变化。 b) 另一方面，应从“方法争议”的角度来审查辩论。黑格尔去世后，谢林公开指责他盗用了他（谢林）早期体系的方法，但同时又对其进行了不恰当的改造。相反，在黑格尔的讲授中，我们发现对谢林完全缺乏方法的指责。该项目将重构这场辩论中涉及的不同方法论，并以比较的方式对其进行讨论。主要论点是，方法问题中的分歧可以根据项目前面步骤中重建的差异概念来精确解释。