The Eternal Concept of the Individual: A Historical, Philological and Systematic Study on Mystical Reason and its Reception in Schelling s Works - Part – Part II: Schelling's Late Philosophy (1827–1846)

个体的永恒概念：对神秘理性及其在谢林作品中的接受的历史、语言学和系统研究 - 第二部分：谢林的晚期哲学（1827â1846）

• 批准号: 267359362
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Andrés Quero-Sánchez
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Lehrstuhl für Geschichte der Philosophie
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2015
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2014-12-31 至 2018-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/267359362?language=en
• 关键词: Eternal; Concept; Individual; Historical; Philological

After having analysed the influence of mystical literature (of Meister Eckhart, Johannes Tauler, the Pseudo-Taulerian Book of Spiritual Poverty, Jacob Boehme, Angelus Silesius, Philipp Matthaeus Hahn, Friedrich Christoph Oetinger and Franz von Baader) on Schelling up to 1826, I am going to investigate the influence of even these same authors (as well as that of Johann Albrecht Bengel) on Schelling's writings from 1827 until 1846, that is to say: on the works written during his second period in Munich and the years in Berlin. My interest focuses now on Schelling's Philosophy of Revelation and his Philosophy of Mythology as well as on the relationship existing between the positive and the negative philosophy. Some mystical authors, like Boehme, Hahn, Bengel and Oetinger, seem to have been crucial for Schelling's development of both the concept of Revelation and the concept of Mythology. Now, this does not mean that Schelling's late philosophy should be considered as a Kind of irrationalistic account, but, on the contrast, he was trying to find the rational structure underlying mysticism, in order to make it useful for the philosophical debates at that time. In this second period of the Research Project, I am also particularly interested in the relationship between Aristotelism and Platonism in Schelling's latest writings, as well as in his reading of those passages in Oetinger in which he was - indirectly - quoting from Meister Eckhart.

在分析了神秘文学的影响之后，（Meister Eckhart，Johannes Tajor，精神贫困的伪陶勒书，雅各布Boehme，Angelus Silesius，Philipp Matthaeus Hahn，Friedrich Christoph Oetinger和Franz von Baader）在谢林到1826年，我将研究这些作者的影响力（以及约翰阿尔布雷希特本格尔）对谢林的著作从1827年至1846年，也就是说：对作品写在他的第二个时期在慕尼黑和年在柏林。我现在的兴趣集中在谢林的启示哲学和神话哲学，以及积极和消极哲学之间存在的关系。一些神秘主义作家，如Boehme，Hahn，Bengel和Oetinger，似乎对谢林的启示录概念和神话概念的发展至关重要。这并不意味着谢林的晚期哲学应该被看作是一种非理性主义的叙述，相反，他试图找到神秘主义背后的理性结构，以便使其对当时的哲学辩论有所帮助。在研究计划的第二阶段，我还特别感兴趣的是谢林最新著作中的柏拉图主义和柏拉图主义之间的关系，以及他对《厄廷格》中间接引用埃克哈特的段落的阅读。