课题基金 / 基金详情

Human Dignity and Minimal Subsistence: The Possibilities of Legitimation and Limitation of a Normative Minimal Standard

Human Dignity and Minimal Subsistence: The Possibilities of Legitimation and Limitation of a Normative Minimal Standard
人的尊严和最低限度的生存:规范性最低限度标准的合法性和限制的可能性
批准号:
282115157
负责人:
Dr. Jens Peter Brune
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
德国
项目类别:
Research Grants
财政年份:
2015
资助国家:
德国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2014-12-31 至 2018-12-31

项目摘要

项目成果

Dr. Jens Peter Brune的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Of the many minimal standards that determine mutual behavioral expectations in different spheres of life, some are of the highest legal and moral relevance. In legal discourse a concept of human dignity that constitutes the inviolable 'core content' of fundamental rights - rights that are in other aspects legally restrictable - frequently comes into play. Analogically, a series of philosophical conceptions of ethics draw on the principle of human dignity in order to mark out a core of moral claims that demand particular regard within the moral sphere, such as human rights. Despite all the criticism regarding the idea of human dignity, in specific argumentation contexts human dignity is evidently given credit for a twofold normative function: on one hand this idea is intended to serve as a 'source' or legitimizing foundation for normative minimal standards; on the other hand it is also expected to restrict the type and scope of the concomitant claims in a rational manner. Many contributions to socio- and legal-political controversies, but also to bioethical ones, draw on this stratification function, at least implicitly. So far the moral-philosophical debate has been revolving primarily around the derivation or justification of basic rights using the principle of human dignity. The reverse problem, however, of limiting such rights becomes more urgent as 'human dignity' becomes more distinctly interpreted as grounding the rights of social participation. Even though this type of claims is still considered a second priority precisely because of their structural vagueness, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany opened a new path in 2010 and 2012 by constitutionally establishing a subjective right to a guaranteed humane minimal subsistence. The research project takes this development as an imputes to make clear the stratifying capability of the concept of human dignity in a comparative study of relevant current philosophical conceptions by using the example of humane minimal existence. At the same time, a general contribution is to be made to the understanding of the principle of human dignity in its established variants of interpretations, to uncover its implications, and to further the transparency of its ethical and legal application.
期刊论文(6)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Phänomenologie
现象学
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-476-05723-5_9
发表时间: 2020
期刊: Hans Jonas-Handbuch
影响因子: --
作者: [Jens Peter]
通讯作者: Jens Peter
Konzepte normativer Minimalstandards
规范性最低标准的概念
DOI: 10.5771/9783845273181-6
发表时间: 2016
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: [Jens Peter, Heinrich, Werner, Micha H. (Hg.)]
通讯作者: Micha H. (Hg.)
Wohlfahrtsstaat und Armut
福利国家与贫困
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-476-05740-2_41
发表时间: 2021
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: [Jens Peter]
通讯作者: Jens Peter
DOI: 10.5771/9783845273181-60
发表时间: 2016
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: [Jens Peter]
通讯作者: Jens Peter
6
    Human Dignity and the Minimum Existence Level: Philosophical Concepts of Decent Existence and their Implications for Law and Policy of the Welfare State
    • 批准号:
      453420147
    • 项目类别:
      Research Grants
    • 资助金额:
      $0.0万
    • 财政年份:
      2021
    • 负责人:
      Dr. Jens Peter Brune
    • 依托单位:
    海外基金