Internationale Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit und Konstitutionalisierung - Akteursvielfalt und Kontestation im Bereich gerichtlicher Auseinandersetzung

拟议项目的研究目标包括确定法院和准司法机构（仲裁）正式背景下关于外国投资国际保护的法律的论述对全球宪法化的影响。为此目的，它侧重于宪法规范-特别是财产权和法治-在投资者与国家争端解决的法律的竞技场中的地位。国际投资仲裁程序最近已成为一个重要的，虽然本身越来越有争议，法律舞台上的基本宪法原则，在跨界背景下，正在形成越来越多的各种不同的行为者：有人认为，这些正式的过程是一个几乎理想的参考领域，对这一问题的分析将有助于RU关于全球宪法化不断变化的叙述的主要研究问题。因此，该项目研究了各自的宪法实践，作为全球宪法实践的一个重要案例，考虑到政府的多样性，政府间和非政府行为者的参与--实际上是自下而上进行的。（1-3年）项目（1）重建关于投资者的主要宪法叙述，国家仲裁，特别是关于法治和给予外国投资者财产权适当保护的仲裁;（2）确定参与正式解释性实践的不同类别的行为者，并选择具体案例进行分析，深度分析;以及（3）调查是否出现了可能最终导致特定国家和/或非国家行为者群体规范性内容发生变化的替代叙述。当项目转向第二阶段（第4-6年）这些变化对国际投资仲裁领域政治和法律的权力转移的影响时，将对结果进行进一步研究。

The proposed project's research objective consists in identifying the effects of legal discourses concerning the international protection of foreign investments in the formal context of courts and quasi-judicial bodies (arbitration) on global constitutionalisation. To that end it focusses on the contestation of constitutional norms - such as in particular property rights and the rule of law - in the legal arena of investor-state dispute settlement. International investment arbitration proceedings have recently emerged as an important, albeit in itself increasingly controversial, legal arena for the contestation of fundamental constitutional principles in a transboundary context being shaped by a growing variety of different actors: It is argued that these formal processes are an almost ideal reference field, the analysis of which will contribute to the RU's leading research question regarding the changing narrative of global constitutionalisation. The project therefore studies the respective contestatory practices as an important case of global constitutional contestation that - considering the diversity of governmental, intergovernmental and non-governmental actors involved - actually takes place from below and from above.During the first phase (years 1-3) the project (1) reconstructs dominant constitutional narratives on investor-state arbitration in particular with regard to the rule of law and the appropriate level of protection granted to property rights of foreign investors; (2) identifies the different categories of actors that partake in the formal contestatory practices vis-à-vis these norms and selects specific cases for an in-depth analysis; and (3) investigates whether alternative narratives have emerged that may ultimately result in changing normative substances in particular groups of state and/or non-state actors. The results stand to be examined by further research when the project turns to the effect of these changes on political and legal power shifts in the realm of international investment arbitration during the second phase (years 4-6).¿