权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The social construction of "authenticity" in architecture. A cultural sociology of practices of judgement in urban built space

建筑“真实性”的社会建构。

基本信息

批准号：
324672076
负责人：
Professor Dr. Andreas Reckwitz
金额：
--
依托单位：
Institut für Sozialwissenschaften
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2017
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2016-12-31 至 2020-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/324672076?language=en
关键词：
social construction authenticity architecture.cultural

项目摘要

Situated in the field of a sociology of culture, the project analyses contemporary practices of the social construction of "authenticity" in urban architecture. The background of this research question is the profound processes of "cultural regeneration", of a "culturalisation" of the urban since the 1980s and 90s, in the course of which Western cities are transformed in terms of their genuinely "cultural" qualities (experience value, consumption, touristic value etc.). In this context, the built space of architecture is shifting into the centre of conflicting social practices of evaluation. The project contends that contemporary social evaluation of the architectural dimension of urban space - by experts and everyday users alike - increasingly revolves around the genuinely cultural value of "authenticity". The recourse to the "authentic" seems to refer to something natural, to a immanent measure of the "well done" - in fact, however, these judgements are based upon complex and often contested social criteria of what counts as authentic and as inauthentic. The project thus is situated at the point of intersection of the - newly founded - sociology of architecture, urban sociology and a sociology of the practices of judgment. Its social-theoretical background is a theory of social practices.The conflicts around the criteria for the evaluation of built space are being explored in two case studies: 1) The first case study deals with the criteria motivating the "design" of architecture on the part of professional architects in architectural firms; 2) The second case study deals with the critical discourses of "making" authenticity on the part of the UNESCO and its awarding of architecture as "world cultural heritage". The project draws on qualitative methods such as participant observation, interviews, discourse analysis and documentary research, besides visual methods of photo elicitation and cognitive or mental mapping are applied.

该项目位于文化社会学领域，分析了城市建筑中“真实性”社会建设的当代实践。这个研究问题的背景是20世纪80年代和90年代以来城市“文化再生”、“文化化”的深刻过程，在此过程中，西方城市在真正的“文化”品质方面发生了转变（体验价值、消费、旅游价值等）。在这种背景下，建筑的建成空间正在成为相互冲突的社会评价实践的中心。该项目认为，专家和日常使用者对城市空间建筑维度的当代社会评价越来越多地围绕着“真实性”的真正文化价值。诉诸“正宗”似乎是指某种自然的东西，是对“做得好”的一种不加限制的衡量--然而，事实上，这些判断是基于复杂的、往往有争议的社会标准，即什么是正宗，什么是不正宗。因此，该项目位于新成立的建筑社会学、城市社会学和判断实践社会学的交叉点。其社会理论背景是社会实践理论，围绕建筑空间评价标准的冲突通过两个案例进行了探讨：1）案例一涉及建筑事务所中专业建筑师的建筑“设计”标准;（2）第二个案例分析了联合国教科文组织对建筑”真实性”的批判性论述及其对建筑“世界文化遗产”的授予。该项目借鉴了定性的方法，如参与观察，访谈，话语分析和文献研究，除了照片启发和认知或心理映射的视觉方法。