权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

公私規範の多層的実現の実体法的検討

公私规范多层次实现的实质性法律审查

基本信息

批准号：
19K13496
负责人：
堀澤明生
金额：
$ 1.83万
依托单位：
The University of Kitakyushu
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
财政年份：
2019
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2019-04-01 至 2024-03-31
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

本研究は、「公私規範の多層的実現の実体法的検討」について検討するものである。negligenceを用いた行政法規範についての私訴の意義は限定的なものに留まると考えたため、今年度はパブリック・ニューサンスの研究に集中することとした。同訴権は、公衆の権利への侵害を観念し、これに対する原則的な救済は行政主体によるインジャンクションであるが、私人も、これと排他的ではない救済として、特別の損害を被っている場合には損害賠償を求めることができるもの（いわゆるspecial injury rule)であり、本研究テーマの恰好の材料となりえるものである。この訴権は、戦後、行政主体による損害賠償が行われるようになっている。奏功しないものも多いが、著名な比較的成功したものにはたばこ訴訟やオピオイド訴訟がある。こうした訴訟について、コモン・ロー上の当該訴権の範囲を不当に拡大するものであるばかりでなく、制度論上も、議会からの委任のない形で行政主体と裁判所により政策問題を解決するものとして批判されている（Merrill等）。近年の、これらの批判にこたえる議論では、主に歴史的な当該訴権のカバーする範囲の広さと、政府の失敗を補完するものとして擁護している（Kendrick）。本研究にとって興味深いのは、オピオイド訴訟における州裁判所の中には行政主体がパブリック・ニューサンスによって医療対応などの特別の損害を被っていると観念することで、special injury ruleを用いているものがあることである。これを制定法的にとらえると、日本行政法でも行政法的手法をより多様化できる可能性がある。

The purpose of this study is to realize the effectiveness of the legal system with a variety of public and private standards. Negligence uses the administrative law rules and regulations to limit the meaning of private prosecution. This year, the study focuses on the study of private prosecution. In the same way as you, the public, the public, the administrative body, the public, the administrative, the public, the administrative, the private, the exclusive, the private, the exclusive, the special, the victim, the victim, the victim, In this study, it just happens that the material is in the middle of the study. After that, the administrative subject will do harm to the administrative body, and then the administrative subject will do so. The success of the game, the success of the famous game, the success of the game, and the success of the famous game. In terms of system theory, in terms of system theory, the association appointed the administrative body in the form of the administrative body, and the court decided to solve the policy issues, and criticize the government (Merrill, etc.). In recent years, the government has been critical in recent years. In recent years, there has been a critical review of recent years. In recent years, the government has been critical in recent years. In recent years, it has been criticized in recent years. In recent years, the government has been critical in recent years. In recent years, it has been criticized that in recent years, students have been criticized in recent years. The purpose of this study is to find out that the administrative body in the state courthouse is not responsible for the loss of health care. In this study, there is a great deal of trouble in this study. In this study, there is a deep feeling that the administrative body in the state courthouse is not responsible for the loss of health care. In this study, there is a deep feeling that the administrative body in the state courthouse is not responsible for the loss of health. In this study, there is a deep feeling in this study. In this study, there is a deep feeling that the administrative body in the state courthouse is not responsible for the health care of the medical staff. In this study, there is a great deal of trouble in this study. In this study, there is a great deal of trouble in this study. In this study, there is a deep feeling that the administrative main body in the state courthouse is not in the state The legislation of the statute law, the administrative law of Japan, the methods of administrative law of Japan, the possibility of diversification.