权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Basic Analysis of Economic Integration in East Asia & Legal Harmonization

东亚经济一体化的基本分析

基本信息

批准号：
16203007
负责人：
NUNOI Tihiro
金额：
$ 17.97万
依托单位：
Hitotsubashi University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
财政年份：
2004
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2004 至 2007
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

The purpose of research is to explore the relationship between economic integration and legal harmonization in EU, NAFTA, MERCOSUR, ASEAN and the possible way to achieve the legal harmonization in the East Asia.The finding of research is that an economic harmonization does not necessarily cause a legal harmonization. The EU oriented an economic integration through legal harmonization from the beginning of setting up the community and obliges the high degree of legal harmonization even on new member states as a prerequisite of EU accession. MERCOSUR also aims at legal harmonization but in the reality it is not achieved at all. NAFTA and ASEAN do not use legal harmonization to realize an economic integration.This means that economic integration does not necessarily need institutional harmonization. But economic integration boosts not only trade volume but also direct investments in the integrated market. To encourage direct investments, it is necessary to develop the economic law system as an infrastructure of integrated market. In Asia, legal technical assistances are provided to achieve this goal by international organizations like World Bank, ADB, UNDP, ODA organizations of donor countries. As a result of competition of legal assistances between donor organizations, patchwork of different legal systems in a recipient country is appearing. This causes a difficulty of understanding the national laws not only by foreigners but also by the nationals. We have to examine the effect of legal patchwork towards economic integration.

本文的研究目的是探讨欧盟、北美自由贸易区、南方共同市场、东盟等国家经济一体化与法律的协调的关系，以及东亚地区实现法律的协调的可能途径。欧盟从成立之初就以法律的协调为经济一体化的方向，并将法律的高度协调作为加入欧盟的先决条件。南锥体共同市场还力求实现法律的统一，但实际上根本没有实现。北美自由贸易区和东盟并没有通过法律的协调来实现经济一体化，这意味着经济一体化并不一定需要制度协调。但经济一体化不仅增加了贸易量，而且增加了对一体化市场的直接投资。为了鼓励直接投资，必须发展作为一体化市场基础设施的经济法体系。在亚洲，世界银行、亚洲开发银行、开发计划署、捐助国的官方发展援助组织等国际组织为实现这一目标提供了法律的技术援助。由于捐助组织之间的法律的援助竞争，受援国出现了不同法律的制度的拼凑。这不仅给外国人，而且也给本国人理解国家法律造成了困难。我们必须研究法律的拼凑对经济一体化的影响。