Parental Responsibility as Fundamental Right and Obligation. A reconstruction of Art. 6 Abs. 2 Basic Law

父母的责任作为基本权利和义务。

• 批准号: 450143255
• 负责人: Dr. Michael von Landenberg-Roberg
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, insbesondere Verwaltungsrecht
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Publication Grants
• 财政年份: 2020
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2019-12-31 至 2020-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/450143255?language=en
• 关键词: Parental; Responsibility; Fundamental; Right; Obligation.

With my reconstruction of Art. 6 sec. 2 Basic Law I have pursued the goal of regaining a viable conceptual starting point from which the current problems of the application of the parental fundamental right can be address with a level of complexity appropriate to the current diversity of its regulatory subject-matter. The starting point of the study was the manifold ambivalences and open questions, to which the dominant interpretation of the fundamental parental right as a right in the best interest of the child on the one hand, and a methodical neglect of the time dimension of fundamental right dogmatical operationalization on the other hand, gave rise (I. part).On the basis of the genesis of the fundamental right in the constitutional assembly (Part II), I have reconstructed in the two central parts of my thesis the intricate ways of its interpretation and application in constitutional jurisprudence. In a first line of development, I have investigated the question of how the problem of the content and temporal limits of the power of determination granted to parents by Article 6(2) of the Basic Law is reflected in the light of the child's independent fundamental right status (Part III). With a second line of development, I then followed up on how the operationalisation of fundamental rights has been dealt with regards to the challenges of the plurality of fundamental rights and the consequences of pluralized family forms (Part IV). On the basis of these lines of development, it is now possible for the first time to understand in depth how constitutional law reacts to social change and how it constructively adapts to it through a changing interpretation of fundamental rights.The reconstruction of its history of application drew attention to the factual problems a convincing interpretation of the parental fundamental right must address. In this way, an adequate awareness of the temporal contextual dependence of certain legal solutions as well as of the social conditions of their respective problem-solving plausibility could be gained.Building on this, I was then able to design a systematic reconstruction of Article 6(2) of the Basic Law (V. Part), which, through a more precise separation of the perspectives of the interests of the child and the parents, not only succeeds in taking better account of the legitimate parental interest at the conceptual level, but also to raise awareness more clearly of the fundamental rights positions of the child. The reconstruction responds to the challenges posed by pluralized family forms and multi-parent constellations by advocation of a further transition from an institution-oriented to an individual-oriented paradigm of interpretation.

在我对《基本法》第6条第2款的重建中，我追求的目标是重新获得一个可行的概念起点，从这个起点出发，父母基本权利适用的当前问题可以以一种与当前监管主题的多样性相适应的复杂性来解决。这项研究的出发点是多方面的矛盾和开放性问题，一方面，对父母的基本权利作为儿童最佳利益的权利的主流解释，另一方面，对基本权利教条化操作的时间维度的有条理的忽视，导致了这些问题（第一部分）。在立宪会议基本权利起源的基础上（第二部分），我在论文的两个中心部分重构了其在宪法学中的解释和应用的复杂方式。在发展的第一步，我研究了《基本法》第6(2)条赋予父母的决定权的内容和时间限制问题，如何反映在儿童独立的基本权利地位上（第三部分）。接着，我继续讨论了基本权利的实施是如何处理基本权利多元化的挑战和多元化家庭形式的后果的（第四部分）。在这些发展路线的基础上，现在有可能第一次深入了解宪法如何对社会变化作出反应，以及它如何通过不断变化的对基本权利的解释建设性地适应社会变化。对其适用历史的重建使人们注意到对父母基本权利作出令人信服的解释必须解决的事实问题。这样，就可以充分认识到某些法律解决办法的时间背景依赖性以及它们各自解决问题的合理性的社会条件。在此基础上，我对《基本法》第6条第2款（第五部分）进行了系统的重构，通过更准确地分离儿童和父母的利益视角，不仅成功地在概念层面上更好地考虑到父母的合法利益，而且更清楚地提高了对儿童基本权利立场的认识。这种重建回应了多元家庭形式和多父星座所带来的挑战，主张进一步从以制度为导向的解释范式过渡到以个人为导向的解释范式。