Parental Responsibility as Fundamental Right and Obligation. A reconstruction of Art. 6 Abs. 2 Basic Law

父母的责任作为基本权利和义务。

• 批准号: 450143255
• 负责人: Dr. Michael von Landenberg-Roberg
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, insbesondere Verwaltungsrecht
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Publication Grants
• 财政年份: 2020
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2019-12-31 至 2020-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/450143255?language=en
• 关键词: Parental; Responsibility; Fundamental; Right; Obligation.

With my reconstruction of Art. 6 sec. 2 Basic Law I have pursued the goal of regaining a viable conceptual starting point from which the current problems of the application of the parental fundamental right can be address with a level of complexity appropriate to the current diversity of its regulatory subject-matter. The starting point of the study was the manifold ambivalences and open questions, to which the dominant interpretation of the fundamental parental right as a right in the best interest of the child on the one hand, and a methodical neglect of the time dimension of fundamental right dogmatical operationalization on the other hand, gave rise (I. part).On the basis of the genesis of the fundamental right in the constitutional assembly (Part II), I have reconstructed in the two central parts of my thesis the intricate ways of its interpretation and application in constitutional jurisprudence. In a first line of development, I have investigated the question of how the problem of the content and temporal limits of the power of determination granted to parents by Article 6(2) of the Basic Law is reflected in the light of the child's independent fundamental right status (Part III). With a second line of development, I then followed up on how the operationalisation of fundamental rights has been dealt with regards to the challenges of the plurality of fundamental rights and the consequences of pluralized family forms (Part IV). On the basis of these lines of development, it is now possible for the first time to understand in depth how constitutional law reacts to social change and how it constructively adapts to it through a changing interpretation of fundamental rights.The reconstruction of its history of application drew attention to the factual problems a convincing interpretation of the parental fundamental right must address. In this way, an adequate awareness of the temporal contextual dependence of certain legal solutions as well as of the social conditions of their respective problem-solving plausibility could be gained.Building on this, I was then able to design a systematic reconstruction of Article 6(2) of the Basic Law (V. Part), which, through a more precise separation of the perspectives of the interests of the child and the parents, not only succeeds in taking better account of the legitimate parental interest at the conceptual level, but also to raise awareness more clearly of the fundamental rights positions of the child. The reconstruction responds to the challenges posed by pluralized family forms and multi-parent constellations by advocation of a further transition from an institution-oriented to an individual-oriented paradigm of interpretation.

我重建艺术。 6秒2我实现的目标是重新获得一个可行的概念起点，目前可以从中使用父母基本权利的问题，可以以适合其监管主题当前多样性的复杂性来解决。该研究的起点是对基本父母权利的主要解释作为对孩子的最大利益的主要解释，一方面是对基本权利的教条操作的时间维度的有条理的忽视，另一方面是基本的教条操作的时间维度，一方面是崛起的（I.部分）。我的论文在宪法法学中的解释和应用的复杂方式。在第一线发展中，我调查了一个问题，即根据孩子的独立基本权利（第三部分），根据基本法第6条第2款授予父母授予父母的决心权力的问题和时间限制。随着第二条发展，我随后跟进了基本权利的运营如何应对多个基本权利的挑战以及多元化家庭形式的后果（第四部分）。基于这些发展趋势，现在第一次有可能深入了解宪法对社会变革的反应以及它如何通过对基本权利的不断变化的解释来建设性地适应它。其应用程序的重建引起了人们对事实问题的重建，这令人信服地解释了对物性基本权利的解释。通过这种方式，可以获得对某些法律解决方案的时间上下文依赖的足够认识，以及他们各自解决问题的合理性的社会条件。在此方面，我就可以在基本法（V. V. Part）的第6（2）条中进行系统地重建，这是一个更加精确的兴趣，即在这方面的更加精确的兴趣，这是一个更加精确的兴趣。在概念层面上的合法父母利益，同时也更清楚地提高人们对儿童基本权利立场的认识。重建通过提出从面向机构的解释范式的进一步过渡，应对多元化的家庭形式和多父母星座所带来的挑战。