权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Lawyers training and legal education during the 19th/20th centuries in five countries(Germany,England,Japan,France and USA)

19/20世纪五个国家（德国、英国、日本、法国和美国）的律师培训和法律教育

基本信息

批准号：
11420003
负责人：
KURODA Tadabumi
金额：
$ 6.4万
依托单位：
Konan University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2001
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-11420003/
关键词：
Lawyers training system Academic legal education Judicial Reform Law School Bar association

项目摘要

In this research project treating of the lawyers training and academic legal education systems during the last 200 years in five countries (Germany, England, Japan, France and USA, we tried to deduce each ' historical type' from them (Kuroda, ' Historical Types of Lawyers Education') and to examine how it was determined by the special situation of state and law, socio-structure-historical basis, especially each character of bar association in such countries. Historical materials and literature for legal education and lawyers training were investigated and elucidated for that purpose, by taking notice of historical institutions and their reform movements in the history of each countries. As historical special resarch subjects, Kuroda made researches the rise of American law schools as a center of lawyers training in relation to bar associations and as concerns German system the Gneist's proposition of 'free advocates' and its realization in the 'Juristische Gesellschaft in Berlin'. Fukao inquired into the miscarried reform movement of english legal education in the late 19th century. Nogami and Misaka inquired French bar and magistrates in reformation since the Revolution. Misaka and Kuroda did research on Japanese legal education in modernization by comparison with western counterparts. We all have often met and discussed together, sometimes with other legal historians and practicing lawyers. The result of this research project will be presented in the one-day-symposium in the annual conference of Japan Legal HistoryAssociation on October 5./6.2002 and published.

本研究项目探讨了五个国家过去200年来的律师培训和学术性法律的教育体系（德国、英国、日本、法国和美国），我们试图从它们中推导出每一种“历史类型”（黑田，“律师教育的历史类型”），并考察它是如何由国家和法律的特殊情况、社会结构历史基础、尤其是这些国家律师协会的各个特征。为此目的，通过对各国历史上的历史制度及其改革运动的注意，对法律的教育和律师培训的历史资料和文献进行了调查和阐释。黑田作为历史专题研究对象，考察了美国法学院作为律师培训中心的兴起与律师协会的关系，以及德国格奈斯派的“自由辩护人”主张及其在“柏林法学会”中的实现。摘要曹操对世纪后期英国法律的教育的失败改革运动进行了探讨。野上和御坂询问了法国大革命以来的律师和地方法官改革情况。Misaka和黑田通过与西方的比较，对日本近代化进程中的法律的教育进行了研究。我们都经常在一起见面和讨论，有时与其他法律的历史学家和执业律师。本研究的成果将在10月5日日本法律的历史学会年会的一天研讨会上发表。2002年6月，出版。