Self-determination and Consensus-formation in Japanese Legalizing Society

1提出了将作为宪法权利的自决权适用于民法契约关系的基本框架; 2从市场调节的角度，厘清了英美判例法中关于契约自由与交易自由的关系; 3厘清了自决权与交易自由之间的复杂关系;确定了劳动法的基本理念，明确了劳动法解决劳动者自主择业问题的基本框架，生命伦理学和医学伦理学的确定和合法化，以及护理专业人员与法律或伦理的关系。5鉴于日本的自决和合法化问题，我们提出了一个基本框架，根据这个框架，纠纷解决制度中的多元权利形成是有序的。6我们询问了我们的现代风险-法律与自我视角下的社会7我们明确了自主价值与完美主义自由主义之间的关系。8我们根据社会选择理论和博弈论中的机会集概念定义了选择自由的概念。9我们探讨了罗尔斯正义理论中的差异原则与互惠原则的关系。10我们明确了什么是选择自由，什么是选择自由。罗尔斯称公共理性适用于法律，并对公共理性的限度从正义的角度进行了探讨。

1 We proposed a basic framework in which self-determination rights as constitutional rights are applied to contract relationship in civil law.2 We made clear Anglo-American case law about freedom of contract and freedom of trade in the perspective of market regulation.3 We made clear complex relation between self-determination rights and rights to existence as the basic ideas of labor law.4 We made clear a basic framework in which law contributes to resolving problems of self-determination and legalization in bioethical and medical ethics, and relation between professionals of care and law or ethics.5 We presented a basic framework in terms of which pluralist rights-formation in dispute resolution system is ordered in view of self-determination and legalization problems in Japan.6 We inquired our modern risk-society in the perspective of law and self-determination.7 We made clear the relation between value of autonomy and perfectionist liberalism.8 We defined the concept of freedom of choice in terms of the concept of opportunity set used in social choice theory and game theory.9 We inquired the relation of difference principle and reciprocity in J.Rawls' theory of justice.10 We made clear how what Rawls calls public reason is applied to law, and the limits of public reason in terms of justice of talk.