权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Toward A Model of Incorporating Gender Perspectives into Legal Professional Education A Study on Current Legal Education and Its Agenda for Gender Equal Society

将性别视角纳入法律职业教育的模式当前法律教育及其性别平等社会议程研究

基本信息

批准号：
14594024
负责人：
MINAMINO Kayo
金额：
$ 2.18万
依托单位：
Kyoto Women's University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-14594024/
关键词：
Gender Gender and Law Feminism Feminist Jurisprudence Legal Education 法学

项目摘要

This research aims at making clear how gender/feminist perspectives can be incorporated into the curriculum of legal professional education in the United States and Japan. The results are as follows : in the United States, almost every law school has at least one course on gender/feminist legal studies and several other substantive law courses have the topic in the syllabi. The underlying factors are : substantial accumulation of feminist legal studies ; substantial body of female or qualified lawyers and faculty who can teach feminist jurisprudence ; administration eager to take students' concrete requests into educational programs. In Japan, on the other hand, law schools hardly seem to recognize feminist legal studies as necessary course in their programs. Paradoxically, law faculties and departments, which do not have law schools, have several gender related courses. The fact that the qualified faculties are very limited has largely affected the law school programs. The problem shared in both countries is, the difficulty to make feminist legal studies a required course. The underlying condition is legal professional education is inclined to be regarded as a means to pass the bar exam, and then, the course is given less priority. It may be seriously taken that the top law schools in the United States set feminist legal studies course count as one of required electives-those few privileged schools put much more importance on cultivating diverse lawyers than passing rates.

本研究的目的在于阐明性别/女性主义观点如何被纳入美国和日本的法律的专业教育课程。研究结果如下：在美国，几乎每个法学院都至少有一门关于性别/女权主义法律的研究的课程，其他几门实体法课程的教学大纲中也有这一主题。其根本因素是：大量的女权主义法律的研究;大量的女性或合格的律师和教师谁可以教女权主义法学;行政部门急于把学生的具体要求纳入教育计划。另一方面，在日本，法学院似乎很少承认女性主义法律的研究是其课程中的必要课程。奇怪的是，没有法学院的法学院和系也开设了一些与性别有关的课程。合格的教师非常有限的事实在很大程度上影响了法学院的课程。两国共同的问题是，很难将女性主义法律的研究作为必修课。其根本原因是，法律的专业教育往往被视为通过律师资格考试的一种手段，因此，该课程的优先程度较低。美国顶尖法学院将女性主义法律的研究课程列为必修课之一，这一点值得认真对待--少数几所享有特权的法学院更重视培养多样化的律师，而不是通过率。