权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Relation between Metamorphosis of Body Consciousness and Media in Contemporary American Literature

美国当代文学中身体意识的变形与媒介的关系

基本信息

批准号：
15520178
负责人：
ISHIWARI Takayoshi
金额：
$ 1.54万
依托单位：
Osaka University of Foreign Studies
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2006
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

On the assumption that what characterizes Pynchon's paranoid subjectivity is a shift of emphasis from individuality in his still novelistic V. to multitudinousness in his groundbreaking Gravity's Rainbow, Ishiwari seeks to demonstrate that this "break" in his representation of paranoid subjectivity coincides with a parallel transition at the formal level: -one from the "novel" to a form that may be described as "post-novelistic." It follows from this, he then argues, that the way the "Bigness" of Pynchon's "Luddite" prevents the author from depicting it as "many" (or as multitudinous "apparitions") should not be left unnoticed in reading his "Luddite" essay. Watanabe delineated the trajectory of Don DeLillo's fiction, placing a special emphasis on the aporia caused by the intriguing analogy between "shooting" lethal weapons and "shooting" films. With this treacherous complicity in view, he analyzed Oswald's amorphous portraits depicted in Libra from the perspective of the phantom-like … More aura the endlessly reite rated footage of an assassinations propagates. In his following discussion on the episodes of the Zapruder Museum and the Texas Highway Killer in Underworld, Watanabe examined the way in which the multi-dimensional "shooting" triggers ahistorical reverberations, concluding that guns and narratives are spirally intertwined in the palimpsestic re-writing of the established history. Masayuki Kishi approached the research project from the following three viewpoints about American drama: (1) Bodies as media for reproducing racial histories of the Other and for deconstructing the official history; (2) Bodies as media for representing the cultural identities of the Other; (3) Bodies as politically and culturally strategic media for the Other's activism, leading to deconstruction of the dominant power. The above research has shown that bodies in modern American drama have transformed and diversified their politics and representation, and thus operate as strongre-representation media for visualizing the problematics of increasingly complex postmodern cultural identities and historiography.10. KEY WORDSAmerican Dramahistorical representationraceMediaDon DeLilloauraPynchonnovel Less

假设品钦偏执主观性的特点是从他仍然小说性的《V.》中的个体性转向他开创性的《万有引力之虹》中的群体性，石原试图证明他对偏执主观性的表述中的这种“突破”与形式层面上的平行转变相一致：从“小说”到一种可以被描述为“后小说”的形式。由此看来，品钦的“勒德分子”的“巨大性”阻止了作者将其描述为“许多”（或众多的“幽灵”），在阅读他的“勒德分子”文章时不应忽视这一点。渡边描绘了唐·德里罗小说的发展轨迹，特别强调了“射击”致命武器和“射击”电影之间有趣的类比所引起的难题。考虑到这种奸诈的同谋，他从无休止地重述暗杀镜头所传播的幽灵般的光环的角度分析了奥斯瓦尔德在《天秤座》中描绘的无定形肖像。在随后对《黑社会》中的《扎普鲁德博物馆》和《德克萨斯公路杀手》的讨论中，渡边审视了多维“射击”引发非历史回响的方式，得出的结论是，枪支和叙事在对既定历史的改写中螺旋式地交织在一起。岸正之从以下三个关于美国戏剧的角度来进行这个研究项目：（1）身体作为再现他者种族历史和解构官方历史的媒介； (2) 作为代表他者文化身份的媒介的机构； (3) 机构作为他者行动的政治和文化战略媒介，导致主导权力的解构。上述研究表明，现代美国戏剧中的身体已经转变并使其政治和表征多样化，从而成为强有力的再现媒体，以可视化日益复杂的后现代文化身份和史学问题。10。关键词美剧历史再现种族媒体唐·德里洛奥拉·品钦小说较少

项目成果

期刊论文数量（176）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

Paper Palaceの迷い子

纸宫失踪的孩子

DOI：
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
英語青年(研究社) 第150巻第1号
影响因子：
0
作者：
ISHIWARI;Takayoshi;Katsuaki Watanabe;Katsuaki Watanabe;Masayuki Kishi;渡辺克昭;貴志雅之;石割隆喜;石割隆喜;石割隆喜;石割隆喜;渡辺克昭;渡辺克昭
通讯作者：
渡辺克昭

演劇史を読み直すQueer Readings

酷儿读物：重读戏剧史

DOI：
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
英語青年 149・5
影响因子：
0
作者：
ISHIWARI;Takayoshi;Katsuaki Watanabe;Katsuaki Watanabe;Katsuaki Watanabe;Katsuaki Watanabe;Katsuaki Watanabe;Katsuaki Watanabe;Masayuki Kishi;Masayuki Kishi;貴志雅之;貴志雅之;渡辺克昭;石割隆喜;石割隆喜;渡辺克昭;貴志雅之;貴志雅之;貴志雅之
通讯作者：
貴志雅之

Errol Hillの遺産 : 決定版『アフリカ系アメリカ演劇史』

埃罗尔·希尔的遗产：非裔美国戏剧的权威历史

DOI：
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
英語青年 149・9
影响因子：
0
作者：
ISHIWARI;Takayoshi;Katsuaki Watanabe;Katsuaki Watanabe;Katsuaki Watanabe;Katsuaki Watanabe;Katsuaki Watanabe;Katsuaki Watanabe;Masayuki Kishi;Masayuki Kishi;貴志雅之;貴志雅之;渡辺克昭;石割隆喜;石割隆喜;渡辺克昭;貴志雅之;貴志雅之;貴志雅之;貴志雅之;貴志雅之
通讯作者：
貴志雅之

Is Pynchon Too Much with the World?- "Is It O. K. to Be a Luddite?" と『ビン・ラディン』

品钦对这个世界太过分了吗？-“成为勒德分子可以吗？”和“本·拉登”