权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Comparative Constitutional Law Study on the National Human Rights Commission in the Asia-Pacific Area.

亚太地区国家人权委员会比较宪法研究。

基本信息

批准号：
15530025
负责人：
INA Masaki
金额：
$ 0.96万
依托单位：
Omiya Law School (2004)Asia University (2003)
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-15530025/
关键词：
Protection and promotion of human rights Regional human rights protection machinery the effectiveness of national human rights commission アジア太平洋地域比較憲法学国内人権機関人権の促進と保護法の支配

项目摘要

By this study I can confirm that the national human rights commission in the Asia-Pacific area has played an active part of promoting and protecting of human rights along its establishment objectives. Typical national human rights commission is useful of human rights protection and supervising the administrative activities, though it cannot has the binding decision force against the human rights violation complaints and the administrative erroneousness. National human rights commission in the Asia-Pacific area provides a valuable forum of remedy and inquiry of human rights violation in the situation of fragile, time-consuming and powerless judicial institutions in the time of democratization.We can conclude that the efficient functioning of the national human. rights commission depends on the following factors ; the democratic governance structure of the state ; the degree of independence of the commission from government ; the extent of the commission's jurisdiction ; the adequacy of the powers given to the commission, including the power to investigate ; the accessibility of the commission to members of the public ; the level of cooperation of the commission with other bodies ; the operational efficiency of the commission ; the accountability of the commission, the personal character of the person(s) appointed to head the commission ; the behavior of government in not politicizing the commission and in having a receptive attitude toward its activities ; and the credibility of the office in the eyes of the populace.Lastly I can evaluate the recent development of the regional cooperation and the technical assistance of the Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions

通过这项研究，我可以证实，亚太地区的国家人权委员会按照其成立目标，在促进和保护人权方面发挥了积极作用。典型的国家人权委员会虽然不能对侵犯人权的申诉和行政失误具有约束性的决定力，但对人权保护和对行政活动的监督是有用的。亚太地区的国家人权委员会为在民主时代司法机构脆弱、耗时和无力的情况下对侵犯人权行为进行补救和调查提供了宝贵的论坛。人权委员会取决于下列因素：国家的民主治理结构；委员会独立于政府的程度；委员会的管辖范围；赋予委员会的权力是否充分，包括调查权；委员会对公众的可及性；委员会与其他机构的合作程度；委员会的运作效率；委员会的问责制；被任命为委员会负责人(S)的个人品格；政府不将委员会政治化并对其活动持接纳态度的行为；最后，我要评价亚太国家人权机构论坛在区域合作和技术援助方面的最新发展