Domestic implementation, of international criminal justice : Function of implementing legislation

国际刑事司法的国内实施：实施立法的职能

• 批准号: 15530037
• 负责人: FURUYA Shuichi
• 金额: $ 1.6万
• 依托单位: Waseda University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2003
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2003 至 2004
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-15530037/
• 关键词: International Criminal Court; Extraordinary Chamber; Special Court for Sierra Leon; Hybrid tribunals; Implementing legislation

In the research project of this year, implementing legislations in terms of the International Criminal Court(ICC) were examined from a comparative point of view. In particular, following points were focused : (1)role of domestic procedures and organs in executing an arrest warrant issued by the ICC ; (2)role of domestic courts in transferring accused to the ICC ; (3)domestic measures to seize the property of a person who was convicted by the ICC ; (4)applicability of domestic penal rules to the execution of sentences declared by the ICC.Through this examination, this investigator came to the following conclusion : In the state which has an ICC implementing legislation besides existing criminal laws, the implementing function of that legislation is generally so effective to succeed to link ICC Statute with domestic legal system. On the contrary, in the state which bases the implementation of ICC Statute on existing criminal laws and procedure, its purpose is not necessarily attained. In some states, relation between their national courts and the ICC is not considered as "vertical" one as in the case of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda (ICTY and ICTR). Those states constitute domestic implementing system for the ICC just as quasi inter-state penal cooperation (an intermediate between "vertical" and "horizontal" systems). In this respect, effective implementation of the ICC system cannot be fully expected because it is dependent on the discretionary power of judiciary of the state concerned.As to the civil procedure concerning seizure of property for compensation to victims, the way of implementation varies from state to state. Remarkably, some states do not respond at all to the compensation for victims that is clearly incorporated in the ICC system.

在今年的研究项目中，从比较的角度审查了国际刑事法院(国际刑院)的执行立法。特别关注的是以下几点：(1)国内程序和机关在执行国际刑事法院发出的逮捕令方面的作用；(2)国内法院在将被告移交给国际刑事法院方面的作用；(3)扣押被国际刑事法院定罪的人的财产的国内措施；(4)国内刑事规则对执行国际刑事法院宣布的判决的适用性。通过这次审查，调查员得出以下结论：在除现有刑法之外还有国际刑事法院执行立法的国家，该立法的执行职能通常是如此有效，以至于能够成功地将国际刑事法院规约与国内法律制度联系起来。相反，在将国际刑事法院规约的实施建立在现有刑事法律和程序基础上的国家，其目的不一定实现。在一些国家，其国家法院与国际刑事法院之间的关系不像前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭和卢旺达问题国际刑事法庭(前南问题国际法庭和卢旺达问题国际法庭)那样被视为“垂直”关系。这些国家构成了国际刑事法院的国内执行制度，就像准国家间的刑事合作(介于“纵向”和“横向”制度之间)。在这方面，不能完全期待国际刑事法院制度的有效实施，因为它依赖于有关国家司法机关的自由裁量权。至于没收财产以补偿受害者的民事程序，各州的实施方式各不相同。值得注意的是，一些州对国际刑事法院制度中明确纳入的受害者赔偿完全没有回应。

项目成果

古谷修一: "カンボジア特別裁判部の意義と問題-国際刑事司法における普遍性と個別性"国際法外交雑誌. 102巻4号. 1-27 (2004)

Shuichi Furuya：“柬埔寨特别法庭的意义和问题——国际刑事司法中的普遍性和个别性”《国际法与外交杂志》，第 102 卷，第 4. 1-27 期（2004 年）。

カンボジア特別裁判部の意義と問題-国際刑事司法における普遍性と個別性-

柬埔寨特别分庭的意义和问题 - 国际刑事司法的普遍性和个别性 -

• 发表时间: 2004
• 期刊: 国際法外交雑誌 102巻4号
• 作者: 佐藤 哲夫;Tetsuo Sato;古谷修一
• 通讯作者: 古谷修一

国際刑事裁判所(ICC)設置の意義と直面する問題

建立国际刑事法院（ICC）的意义和面临的问题

• 发表时间: 2004
• 期刊: 法学教室 281号
• 作者: 佐藤 哲夫;Tetsuo Sato;古谷修一;古谷修一
• 通讯作者: 古谷修一

Establishment of the International Criminal Court(ICC) : Its significance and problems

国际刑事法院（ICC）的成立：意义与问题

• 发表时间: 2004
• 期刊: Hogaku Kyoshitsu No.281
• 作者: 佐藤 哲夫;Tetsuo Sato;古谷修一;古谷修一;Shuichi Furuya;Shuichi Furuya
• 通讯作者: Shuichi Furuya

Establishing the Extraordinary Chambers in Cambodia : Universalism and Localism in the International Criminal Justice

柬埔寨特别法庭的设立:国际刑事司法中的普遍主义和地方主义

• 发表时间: 2004
• 期刊: KOKUSAIHOU GAIKOU ZASSI VOL.102
• 作者: 佐藤 哲夫;Tetsuo Sato;古谷修一;古谷修一;Shuichi Furuya
• 通讯作者: Shuichi Furuya