Should Japanese Design Law and Trademark Law be revised in order to fir internet environment?

本研究课题是关于与互联网现状相对应的日本外观设计法和商标法修正案的可能性的3个课题，包括1）电脑和移动的电话用下载图像的外观设计保护的可能性，2）“香味”商标或气味标志的保护资格，3）在使用搜索引擎时，将商标词放入元标签中是否属于“商业使用”。在研究初期，我们计划收集和考察国外的立法例、判例（特别是发达国家），然后考虑修改建议。关于第一个主题，即设计法领域，特别是用于计算机或移动的电话的可下载数字图像或表格数据。然而，我们无法得到正式报告，这应该是计划在本研究申请进行审查，没有最终确定，然后我们改变了研究计划。新的主题是关于一个 关于我们 只有真正的创造者才能提出申请。这种申请权应当由真实的创作者享有，但这种申请权被法律规定为可能被无权者侵犯。佐藤就这个话题写了一个案例说明。至于第二个“香水”的商标，英国和美国的立法确认了恒定的注册实例，但似乎没有这样的先例，即该商标可以通过互联网或其他数字技术转移。我们认为，这是罕见的，以区分一个物品的香味，但它确实是一个结论，有必要的制度设置时，有可能的未来，我们可以区分其识别标记的多样化在市场上。第三，搜索引擎审查了反对的思维方式，即使用与另一个人的商标相同的字符串在元标签中做，除非它被使用的思维方式（美国先例）和商标使用的商标，并审查了类似的论点，如弹出广告或关键字广告（关键字）。结论在是否有相关字符串的指示方面是不同的，并且元标记是没有统一讨论的结论。此外，在美国和法国的研究项目结束之前，宣布了一个名为关键字购买的域名的重要试验示例（他们的结论不同），但由于缺乏下一次机会，因此委托了足够的检查。少

This research project is devoted 3 topics about possibility of amendment for Japan's Design Act and Trademark Act amendment corresponding to present internet circumstances, including 1) possibility of the design protection of the download image using for a computer and mobile telephone, 2) eligibility for protection for "fragrance" trademark or scent mark, 3) whether putting trademark words into meta-tag is 'use in commerce' at using search engine or not, At the initial stage, we planned that our research was going to collect and examine legislation examples, trial examples in many foreign countries (especially of developed nations), then consider amendment proposals. On the first topic, namely Design Law field, especially downloadable digital image or form data using for a computer or mobile phone. However, we could not have official report, which should be planned to be examined at this research application, was not finalized, then we changed research plan. The new topic is about one … More f the basic principles 'true creator only can make application'. Such right to make an application should be hold by real creators is codified could be infringed by somebody without the rights. Sato writes a case note on this topic. As for the trademark of the second "fragrance", constant registration example was confirmed with Britain and the United States legislation, but there seemed to be no such precedent that such mark could be transferred via internet or other digital technology. We thought that it is rare to distinguish an article with a fragrance, but it is really a conclusion that there is necessity of the system setting when it is possible future that we can distinguish its identification mark diversification in the market. The use by the third, search engine examined the opposition of the way of thinking that the use of the character string same as the trademark of another person in the metatag did unless it was used a way of thinking (an American precedent) and the trademark used the trademark for and examined similar arguments such as pop-up advertisement or a keyword advertisement (keyword by). Conclusions are different in having indication or not of the character string concerned, and a metatag is the conclusion that is not discussed uniformly. In addition, the importance trial example of a domain called keyword-buy was announced just before the end of the research project in United States of America and France (their conclusions are different), but enough examination was entrusted for lack of at the next opportunity. Less