权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A study of physiological polymorphism of the biological rhythm in homebound elderly living alone and improvement of their Quality of Life

居家独居老人生物节律生理多态性及其生活质量改善的研究

基本信息

批准号：
15570201
负责人：
ISHIKAWA Takashi
金额：
$ 2.37万
依托单位：
Akita University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2005
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

1)The proportion of circadian rhythm abnormalities was significantly higher in the homebound elderly than in the non-homebound elderly. Analysis in relation to living alone or with someone, the proportion of circadian rhythm abnormalities was significantly higher in elderly living alone (the living-alone group) than in elderly living with someone (the shared-living group).2)In both the homebound group and the non-homebound group, two types of circadian rhythm abnormalities (the decreased-circadian-amplitude type and the no-boundary-between -day-and-night type) were recognized. In both the living-alone group and the shared-living group, the same types were recognized.3)The amount of activity and exposure to light were smaller in the homebound elderly than in the non-homebound elderly, suggesting that the decreases in activity and in the frequency of going outdoors was probably associated with an elevated proportion of circadian rhythm abnormalities. The amount of activity and exposure t … More o light were smaller in the living-alone group than in the shared-living group, suggesting that the activities of elderly living alone tended to be confined to a narrow area in and around their homes.4)The biosocial rhythm synchronization score, as rated by a questionnaire designed to determine the biosocial rhythm of daily living, was significantly lower in the homebound elderly than in the non-homebound elderly. Its score was significantly lower in the living-alone group than in the shared-living group. Among others, the social synchronization score was particularly low in the homebound group and living-alone group.5)In terms of the degree of independence in the activities of daily living, there was no marked difference between the homebound group and the non-homebound group. Furthermore, there was also no marked difference between the two groups in the degree of satisfaction with daily living or the presence/absence of hobbies. The same results were recognized between the living-alone group and the shared-living group. Less

1)居家老年人昼夜节律异常的比例明显高于非居家老年人。与独居或与人同住相关的分析显示，独居老人昼夜节律异常的比例明显高于独居老人（独居组）比与人同住的老年人（共享生活组）。2）在居家组和非居家组中，识别出两种类型的昼夜节律异常（昼夜幅度减小型和昼夜之间无边界型）。在独居组和共享生活组中，识别出相同的类型。3）居家老年人的活动量和暴露于光的量小于非居家老年人，这表明活动量和外出频率的减少可能与昼夜节律异常的比例升高有关。活动量和暴露量 ...更多信息结果显示，独居老人的活动范围较居家老人为小，独居老人的活动范围较居家老人为小。4）居家老人的生物社会节律同步性得分显著低于非居家老人，而居家老人的生物社会节律同步性得分显著低于非居家老人。独居组的得分显著低于共享组。其中，居家组和独居组的社会同步性得分最低。5）居家组和非居家组在日常生活活动的独立性方面没有显著差异。此外，两组在日常生活满意度或有/无爱好方面也没有显著差异。在独居组和共享生活组之间也得到了相同的结果。少