Making Landscape. Approaching the pre- and prothistoric taskscapes on the islet of Sant’Antioco/Sardinia.

努尔亚吉亚时期的南撒丁岛是更广泛的地中海海运网络的一部分，这反映在几个物质遗迹中：发现了迈锡尼和塞浦路斯陶器，确认了冶金证据中的外部影响，以及在东地中海发现的努雷吉亚海越来越多。虽然众所周知，南部撒丁岛参与了这一更广泛的地中海网络，但几乎不知道努里亚吉亚人是如何真正参与其中的。居民是积极地塑造了这些网络，还是相当被动的消费者，这一问题仍然值得商榷。正如后者经常被含蓄地假设的那样，本研究旨在通过对圣安提奥科岛的微区域的调查，阐明努里西奇人参与海洋世界和海上相互关系。纪念性的托儿所遗址的高密度无疑说明了该地区在这一时期的关键作用。这一关键作用的一个可能原因--就像后来的腓尼基和布匿时期一样--是因为小岛的海洋特征及其天然港口，在那里，圣安提奥科明显不同于撒丁岛其他被调查的微型地区。后者大多位于内陆山区，被认为是青铜器时代和铁器时代早期人口假定的田园生活的典型。相反，Sant‘antioco的居民已经利用了新石器时代和胆石时代的海洋特征，这可以通过碧玉和黑岩分布所反映的海上网络来显示。马拉德罗西亚、比安卡岛或特里加港的努拉格S‘Ega Marteddu的海向支持了史前时期类似的假设。这样的海洋景观在努尔吉亚考古学中从未被系统地分析过。因此，该项目的目的将是填补这一空白，并将重点放在这一独特的特征上，作为景观考古方法的一部分。作为一项景观考古研究，它的目标是超越对沿海托儿所的少数且往往是零碎的研究，或主要是对进口物品的无背景清单的研究。相反，该项目有一个相当全面的方法，调查居民在自给自足的经济和交换领域内的日常生活，以及他们参与更多零星的仪式、社会或政治活动。分析的任务景观及其空间布局将帮助我们追踪居民特定的陆地和海景分配，并挖掘出他们可能的感知和意义。这样的背景分析有可能打破几乎是刻板印象的纽伦西亚人作为登山者和牧民，局限于田园生活，远离大海的观念，这种观念往往在文学和旅游商业化中得到延续，并在一定程度上进入了对当地身份和营销的叙述中。

Southern Sardinia during the Nuragic period was part of a wider Mediterranean seaborn web which is reflected in several material remains: the discovery of Mycenaean and Cypriote pottery, the identification of external influences in the metallurgical evidence and the increasing number of Nuragic finds in the Eastern Mediterranean. While it is well-known that southern Sardinia participated in this wider Mediterranean network, almost nothing is known about how the Nuragic population was indeed involved. It remains open to questions whether the inhabitants were actively shaping these networks or a rather passive consumer.As the latter has been often implicitly assumed, the study aims to illuminate the Nuragic involvement into the maritime world and seaborn interrelations through the investigation of the micro-region of the islet of Sant’Antioco. The high density of monumental Nuragic sites unquestionable speaks for the region’s key role during this period. A possible reason for this key role – as it is for the later Phoenician and Punic period - is the maritime character of the islet with its natural harbours in which Sant’Antioco clearly differs from other investigated microregions of Sardinia. The latter are mostly located in the mountainous inland and are considered as being typical for the assumed pastoral subsistence of the Bronze and Early Iron Age population. In contrast, the inhabitants of Sant’Antioco already took advantage of the maritime character in the Neolithic and Chalcolithic period as it can be shown by a seaborn network reflected in the jasper and obsidian distribution. The sea-orientation of the Nuraghe S’Ega Marteddu of Maladroxia, Cala Bianca or Porto di Triga support a similar assumption for the protohistoric period. Such a maritime landscape has never been systematically analyzed in Nuragic archaeology. Therefore, the aim of the project will be to fill this gap and to focus on this unique feature as part of a landscape- archaeological approach.As a landscape-archaeological study it aims to reach beyond the few and often fragmentary studies of coastal nuraghe or the mostly decontextualized listing of imported objects. Instead, the project has a rather holistic approach and investigates the inhabitant’s daily routines within the realm of subsistence economy and exchange as well as their involvement in more sporadic ritual, social or political activities. The analyzed taskscapes and their spatial layout will help us to trace the specific land- and seascape appropriation of the inhabitants and to carve out their possible perceptions and meanings. Such a contextual analysis has the potential to break the almost stereotype idea of the Nuragic population as mountaineers and herdsman, restricted to pastoral life and averted from the sea, which is often perpetuated in literature and touristic commercialization and which has partly entered narratives of local identity and marketing.