Constructing facticity:How underdetermination drives communication for special purposes

构建事实性：不确定性如何驱动特殊目的的沟通

• 批准号: 516407591
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Ekkehard Felder
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Institut für Germanistik und Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/516407591?language=en
• 关键词: Constructing; facticity; How; underdetermination; drives

The research project aims at investigating dynamic processes of exchange and oscillation between psychiatric and legal communication from the 19th to the 20th century in order to get a hold of the resulting constructions of factuality. In doing so, the focus will be on the behavioral problems referred to as dissocial personality disorders in psychiatric diagnosis as objects of negotiation in interdisciplinary communication. Since the end of the 18th century, these personality disorders have not only been part of the basic body of psychiatric pathologies, but are also taken up as a forensically relevant subject and regularly find their way into jurisprudence. There, for a long time, they were referred to as mental abnormality. Today, however, § 20 StGB speaks of severe other mental disorder. Despite diachronic variability and controversy in the descriptions of these disorders, the law nevertheless resorts to these descriptions and accepts them as fact. This raises the question of how a scientific object – considering its disputed status and the difficulty of its determination – is constituted, and how the knowledge associated with it is transformed in the interaction of the various disciplines. Thus, the research project will investigate the interactions between psychiatric constructions of the non-normal and their meanings for law and jurisprudence. In this way, the aspects of underdetermination as a motor of technical communication, which have hardly been outlined in technical language research so far, will be captured and reflected upon. In this way, this approach will thereby exemplarily retrace the successive development of a technical language as an independent discipline of knowledge and science by means of psychiatric technical communication. In addition, the approach will record interdisciplinary adoption, further development and influence processes - namely on the basis of the interdependent exchange as a communicative relationship between psychiatric and legal specialist communication.

本研究旨在探讨19至20世纪世纪精神病学与法律的交流的动态过程，以掌握由此产生的事实建构。在这样做的时候，重点将放在行为问题上，被称为精神病诊断中的反社会人格障碍，作为跨学科交流中谈判的对象。自18世纪末以来，这些人格障碍不仅是精神病病理学的基本组成部分，而且还被作为法医学相关主题，并定期进入法学。在那里，很长一段时间，他们被称为精神异常。然而，今天，《刑法》第20条谈到了其他严重的精神障碍。尽管在对这些疾病的描述中存在着历时性的变化和争议，但法律仍然诉诸于这些描述，并将其视为事实。这就提出了这样一个问题：考虑到其有争议的地位及其确定的困难，一个科学对象是如何构成的，以及与之相关的知识如何在各学科的相互作用中转化。因此，该研究项目将调查非正常的精神病学结构之间的相互作用及其对法律和法理学的意义。通过这种方式，作为一个马达的技术交流，这几乎没有在技术语言研究概述到目前为止，不足的方面将被捕获和反思。通过这种方式，这种方法将示范性地追溯技术语言作为知识和科学的独立学科的连续发展，通过精神病学技术交流。此外，该方法将记录跨学科的采用，进一步发展和影响过程-即在相互依存的交流的基础上，作为精神病学和法律的专家沟通之间的沟通关系。