The Rise of Polis-society and its Change

我的研究成果是一篇名为《雅典民主与Metic-status的形成与消失》的文章。全文总结如下：本文首先分析了公元前6世纪晚期纳先人阿那克西拉的丧葬警句。他发现了阿提卡字母切割器的一个错误，因此，从警句中恢复了阿提卡最古老的单词“muepsilontauomicroniotakappaomicrons”，意思是移民/非移民（muepsilontauomicroniotakappaomicrons）。然后，他注意到“ALPHATHETAepsilonnualphaiotaomicroniota tauiotaepsilonsigmakappaomicronnu”这句话（雅典人称赞），并怀疑这句“alphathetaepsilonnualphaiotaomicronota”是官方文件的复制，例如议会和/或demos的法令。如果是这样的话，应当指出，经证实的词“muepsilontaualphaomicroniotakappaomicrons”实际上是官方承认的医学地位的技术术语。这意味着阿那克西拉的警句给了我们更多关于雅典城邦地位正式形成的时间。所以阿那克西拉警句的日期成为争论的关键点。作者将其与公元前506年雅典人为自己新生的民主而与波奥提亚人和Chalkidians人以及后来与埃基纳人的战争联系起来。阿克罗波里斯纪念碑上的布瓦提亚人和chalkidian人的战争显然与这场战争有关。但是，作者认为，《雅典人的宝库》和《雅典人的Stoa》这两篇雅典人在德尔菲神庙的奉献应该放在同一个历史背景中。它们显示了这场胜利对于克莱斯特尼民主统治下的雅典人来说有多么重要。阿那西拉警句中的“alphathetaepsilonnualphaiotaomicroniota”句可以作为克列斯提尼改革和雅典民族地位形成的证据。至于雅典民族地位的消失，作者考察了公元前三世纪的一些铭文，即授予epsilongammagammakappatauetasigmaiotas的法令；没收记录；与雅典起义（公元前287年）有关的荣誉法令。与罗马时代公认的外国人在提斯比的土地信用活动相比，作者怀疑类似的情况在公元前二世纪初的雅典也应该开始出现

My research has resulted in the essay titled " Athenian Democracy and the Formation and Disappearence of Metic-status". Its summary is as follows :The author analyses, at first, the late sixth century B. C. funeral epigram of Anaxilas the Naxian. He discovered an Attic letter-cutter's error and, thus, recovered from the epigram the oldest Attic word "muepsilontaualphaomicroniotakappaomicrons" which means an immigrant/metic(muepsilontauomicroniotakappaomicrons). And then, he pays his attention to the phrase "'ALPHATHETAepsilonnualphaiotaomicroniota tauiotaepsilonsigmakappaomicronnu " (the Athenians praised) and does suspect this 'ALPHATHETAepsilonnualphaiotaomicroniota-clause to have been a reproduction of an official document, e. g. a decree of the boule and/or the demos. If so, it should be noted, the attested word "muepsilontaualphaomicroniotakappaomicrons" was in reality an officially recognised technical term for the metic-status. This implies that the Anaxilas-epigram gives us ter … More minus ante quem for the date of the official formationof the Athenian metic-status. So the date of the Anaxilas-epigram becomes a crucial point of the argument. The author connects it with the war the Athenians fought c. 506 B. C. for their own new-born democracy against the Boeotians and Chalkidians and, later, also against the Aeginetans. The Akropolis-monument of the dekate from the Boitians and Chalkidians relates clearly to this war. But, the author suggests that "Treasury of the Athenians" and " Stoa of the Athenians ", the Athenian dedications both in the Delphic sanctuary, should be set in the same historical context. They show how great was the significance this victory had for the Athenians under the Kleisthenic democracy. The 'ALPHATHETAepsilonnualphaiotaomicroniota-clause of Anaxilas-epigram should be taken for an evidence of Kleisthenes' Reform and the formation of Athenian metic-status.As for the disappearence of Athenian metic-status, the author examined a number of inscriptions dated to the third century B. C., i. e. decrees with the grant of epsilongammagammakappatauetasigmaiotas ; records of confiscation ; honorary decrees related to the Revolt of Athens (287 B. C.). Comparing with the recognised land-credit activities of the foreigners at Thisbe in the Roman times, the author suspects that similar situation should have began to appear also at Athens at the beginning of the second century B. C. Less