ON THE COMPARATIVE LAW CONCERNING THE OWNERSHIP OF LAND IN ITALY AND JAPAN

论意大利和日本土地所有权的比较法

• 批准号: 03620019
• 负责人: OKAMOTO Shoji
• 金额: $ 1.47万
• 依托单位: SHIMANE UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1991
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1991 至 1993
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-03620019/
• 关键词: OWNERSHIP OF LAND; RIGHT OF BUILDING; ITALIAN TOWN PLANNING ACT; イタリア都市計画立法; 都市的土地所有権; イタリア土地所有権; 都市計画規制; 建築所有権

THE INTENTION OF THIS STUDY IS THE RESEARCH ON THE RELATION-SHIP BETWEEN OWNERSHIP (ESTATE) AND TOWN PLANNING ACT IN ITALY ADN JAPAN.THE RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP (JUS AEDIFICANDI) IS LIMITED BY REST-RICTIONS WICH DERIVE FROM THE PUBLIC INTERST OF TOWN PLANNING.ITALIAN TOWN PLANNING HAS MASTERPLAN AND SEVERAL GOOD METHODS OF PRACTICE.THE LATTER CONTAINS THE BUILDING LICENSE (CONCESSIONE EDILIZIA), THE ZOWNING AND THE BUILDING STANDARDS.SO THE RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP IS NOT UNLIMITED BUT MEETS GREAT RESTRICTION.ACCRDING TO THIS ORGANISATION AND RESTRICTION, ITALIAN LEGAL EXISTING SYSTEM REALIZES A PERFECT TOWN PLANNING AND CONTROLS THE RIGHT FO LAND.HOWEVER THE SAME SYSTEM DOES NOT OBTAIN IN JAPAN.JAPANESE SYSTEM DOES NOT CONTROL ENOUGH THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOWN.BECAUSE IT BASE ON THE NOTION OF PERFECT OWNERSHIP.SO THERE ARE MANY THINGS WE MUST LEAN FROM ITALIAN SYSTEM OF THE OWNERSHIP AND TOWN PLANNING.

本文旨在研究意大利和日本的所有权（不动产）与城市规划法的关系。意大利的城市规划有许多优秀的实践方法，其中包括建筑许可证制度，它是一种以城市规划的公共利益为出发点的法律制度（特许经营），分区和建筑标准。因此，所有权不是无限的，而是受到很大的限制。根据这种组织和限制，意大利的现行法律制度实现了完善的城市规划和土地权控制，而日本的土地权控制制度却没有实现，日本的土地权控制制度对城市规划的控制力度不够，意大利的所有权制度和城镇规划有许多值得我们借鉴的地方。

项目成果

岡本詔治: "イタリア都市計画法制の史的考察(上)" 島大法学. 37. 39-72 (1994)

Shoji Okamoto：“意大利城市规划立法的历史考量（第 1 部分）”志摩大学法 37. 39-72 (1994)

OKAMOTO,SHOJI: "HISUTORY OF TOWN PLANNING ACT IN ITALY" SHIMADAI HOGAK. 37-4. 39-72 (1994)

冈本庄二：《意大利城镇规划法的历史》岛田法学。