To make an introduction of Chinese exegetical studies and a catalog of related papers

在此期间，我发表了四篇论文。在汉语语音方面，我选择了卡尔仁、鲁志伟(*)、东通和(*)、李方贵(*)的五篇研究，并在《汉语注释研究论文(1)》和《注释研究论文(2)》中对其内容进行了说明。这两篇文章引用了约40篇相关文献。古代汉语中的电话是从卡尔格伦的理论中展示出来的，但我解释说，他的理论仍然存在一些问题。从卡尔仁到李芳贵，通过追溯他们的古汉语音素理论的变化，我解释说：(1)古汉语中的音素大约有22个韵母组；(2)古汉语的声母是由拼音序列拼写而成的，但由于有必要假设古汉语中存在复合声母，因此往往是不可靠的。至于汉语注释研究，我从《杨树达》(*)中选取了《标点符号释经实例》。标点符号通常放在句子的末尾，在古代它们被忽略了。另一方面，杨树达认为它们是重要的，收集了180个经典标点错误的例子。《汉注研究(三)》引用了20种论文和文献，并对其进行了详细说明。齐佩荣的《中国训泻学导论》(*)是第一部优秀的科学文献。《汉注(四)》对其内容进行了详细的阐释，引用了数十篇文献和论文。对于与训注研究有关的汉字学，我尝试了文献和目录学的解释，但仍是一个有待解决的问题。

I have published four essays within the period.About phonetics of Chinese, I selected five studies from Karlgren, Luzhiwei (***), Dongtonghe (***), and Lifanggui (***) and explained their contents in "An essay on the Chinese Exegetical Studies (1)" and "An Essay on the Exegetical Studies (2)". The two essays quoted about 40 related papers.The phone in ancient Chinese was showed from the theory of Karlgren, but I explained that his theory still had some problems. From Karlgren to Lifanggui, by tracing changes of their theories of phones in archaic Chinese, I explained (1) the phone in archaic Chinese have about 22 final groups, (2) the initials of archaic Chinese were reconstructed from phonetic series of scripts, but it is often unreliable because it is necessary to suppose the existence of compound initials in archaic Chinese.As for the Chinese Exegetical studies, I took up "The examples of interpretation of classics by punctuation (『******』)" from Yangshuda (***). The punctuation marks are usually put at the end of the sentences, in ancient times they were neglected. On the other hand, Yangshuda regarded them as important and gathered 180 erroneous examples of punctuations of classics.. "On the Chinese Exegetical studies (3)" quoted 20 kinds of theses and literature, and explained them in detail. "An introduction of Chinese exegetical studies" of Qipeirong (***) is the first superior and scientific literature. "On the Chinese exegetical studies (4)" explains its contents in detail and quoted dozens of literature and paper.As for the Chinese graphology which relates to the exegetical studies, Ihad tried the explanation of the literature and bibliographies, but it still remain a problem to be solved in the future.