权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Study on Symposion in Ancient Greece

古希腊座谈会研究

基本信息

批准号：
08610393
负责人：
FURUYAMA Masato
金额：
$ 1.41万
依托单位：
KOKUGAKUIN UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1996
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1996 至 1997
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

I met and discussed on Symposion with Prof.Oswyn Murray in Balior College, Oxford in Sept.1997. What we discussed on that occasion is that whether or not we could ever explain and understand the Greek history diachronically by means of the concept of Symposion. When I began this research, I was stimulated and motivated by a set of articles on Symposion by Murray in 1980s. Inspired by F.Bourriot and D.Roussel who denied phratria and genos to have been originally kinship groups, He tried to find the basic principles of social and political organizations in Archaic age in the organizations of communal commensality based on equality. In our discussion, Murray told that he still keeps his opinion that the theory on Symposion is valid to understand Archaic age Greece. But he admitted that his prospect of the applicability of his theory to Greek history diachronically was not so good. He argued that it is applicable to the study of cultural history.In Japan there appeared a full-scale and detailed article by S.Ito in Shigaku Zasshi 106-11,1997, which criticized F.Bourriot and D.Roussel. But I still admit the theory on Symposion is promising to understand the principles of social and political organizations from the emergence of polis to Archaic age. Moreover, I think it promising to study further and attest positively ideas which Murray suggested and referred to in his articles. I am going to report on Spartan syssitia and agoge in the meeting of Legal History Association in April 1998.As for iconographic study, I have preserved pictures and figures published in books and articles in a hard disc. But because of my low proficiency in manipulating softwares, I have not yet realized the anticipated outcome. This is a problem to be solved henceforth.

1997年9月，我在牛津大学巴利奥学院与默里教授会面并讨论了研讨会。我们当时讨论的是，我们是否可以通过“合会”的概念来解释和理解希腊历史。当我开始这项研究时，我受到了Murray在20世纪80年代发表的一组关于Symposion的文章的刺激和激励。受布尔里奥特和迪塞尔否认法拉脱里亚和格诺斯最初是亲属集团的启发，他试图在平等基础上的共同体组织中寻找中世纪社会政治组织的基本原则。在我们的讨论中，默里告诉我们，他仍然坚持他的观点，即关于Symposion的理论对于理解中世纪希腊是有效的。但他承认，他的理论在希腊历史上的适用性的前景并不那么好。在日本，1997年出版的《志学杂志》第106- 11期刊登了伊藤慎太郎的一篇全面而详尽的文章，批评了布尔里奥特和迪塞尔。但是，我仍然承认，“合会”理论对于理解从城邦出现到中世纪的社会政治组织的原理是有希望的。此外，我认为它有希望进一步研究和证明积极的想法，默里建议和提到他的文章。我将在1998年4月的法律的历史协会会议上报告斯巴达的syssitia和agoge。至于图像学研究，我将在书籍和文章中发表的图片和数字保存在硬盘中。但由于我对操作软件的熟练程度不高，我还没有实现预期的结果。这是今后要解决的问题。