课题基金 / 基金详情

Research on the Philosophy of Nature in German Idealism (particularly F.W.J. Schelling and G.W.F. Hegel)

Research on the Philosophy of Nature in German Idealism (particularly F.W.J. Schelling and G.W.F. Hegel)
德国唯心主义自然哲学研究(特别是F.W.J.谢林和G.W.F.黑格尔)
批准号:
11610013
负责人:
NAGASHIMA Takashi
金额:
$1.73万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
日本
项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份:
1999
资助国家:
日本
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
1999 至 2001

项目摘要

项目成果

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
In this third year I have developed my research project in following direction : Firstly the research on the debate around 1800 between Andreas Roschlaub and Christoph Wilhelm Hufeland based on the history of medicine. Secondly the research on F. W. J. Schelling and A. K. Eschenmayer.With regard to the first research I collected materials of Roschlaub in the preceding year, in this year I have collected the materials of Hufeland, particularly his journal. Moreover I have gotten in contact with Japanese researcher on Hufeland. I have been lectured by him on the life of Hufeland, particularly on the relation of Hufeland with Kant and discussed with him.In the research-process I have put materials on Roschlaub in order and investigated issues from the standpoint of Roschlaub's materials. I analyzed Rtfschlaub's papers on Brownianism in his Magazin zur Verkommnung der theoretischen und praktischen Heilkunde and drew up the list of Rdschlaub's literature. As the result of the research I have written a paper on him as researchnote.With regard to the second research I have a paper on this theme. And I reexamined this theme and confirmed that the relation of Eschenmayer with Schelling can be analyzed from their correspondence, and yet that the issue of this relation and their debate to 1806 concentrated on the theme Naturphilosophie and its principle. Third debate is different from two preceding debates on the point that around 1809 the debate with Jacobi, his estimate of Spinozismus and the relation with Boehme grew central theme in the development of Schelling's thinking Therefore we must analyze this third debate in another form as two debates.
期刊论文(13)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
長島 隆: "自然哲学の超越論的基礎付けから自然哲学の自立へ"自然哲学研究. 第12号. 15-42 (2002)
长岛隆:《从自然哲学的先验基础到自然哲学的独立性》《自然哲学研究》第12期15-42(2002)。
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
寄川条路, 長島 隆: "(翻訳)ラインホルトのシェリング自然哲学書評"自然哲学研究. 第12巻. 43-65 (2002)
Joji Yorikawa,Takashi Nagashima:“(翻译)莱因霍尔德对谢林自然哲学的评论”自然哲学杂志第 12 卷 43-65(2002 年)。
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
寄川条路, 長島 隆: "(翻訳)ラインホルトのシェリング自然哲学書評"自然哲学研究. 第12号. 43-65 (2002)
Joji Yorikawa、Takashi Nagashima:“(翻译)莱因霍尔德对谢林自然哲学的评论”《自然哲学杂志》第 12 期。43-65(2002 年)。
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
長島隆: "シェリングとエッシェンマイヤー-往復書簡の中から、シェリングの思想発展におけるエッシェンマイヤーとの論争の位置"日本医科大学基礎科学紀要. 29号. 47-70 (2000)
Takashi Nagashima:“谢林和埃申迈尔 - 从他们的信件中看与埃申迈尔的争论在谢林思想发展中的地位”《日本医学院基础科学通报》第 29 期。47-70 (2000)。
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
13