A study of comparative law concerning administrative litigation and the state compensation system-focused on the systems of main western countries and eastern Asian countries

本研究可以看作是笔者之前对日本国家赔偿制度与中国比较研究的继续。本文在更大范围内，以法、德、英、美等西方主要国家以及亚洲国家特别是东亚国家的国家赔偿制度为研究对象，从东西方法不同的文化传统背景出发，不仅探讨了西方国家与亚洲国家国家赔偿制度的差异，而且也探讨了以大陆法系和英美法系为基础的西方国家赔偿制度对亚洲国家的影响。作为国家赔偿制度的重要组成部分，国家赔偿制度是国家赔偿制度的重要组成部分。本文选择警察等公职人员因刑事、民事案件中发生的违法行为冤假错案以及涉及司法公正的执法中的司法赔偿责任作为本文的研究重点。详细研究了各国司法赔偿制度的特点和构成司法赔偿的条件。此外，还讨论了与司法赔偿有关的几个问题及解决办法。

This research can be considered as a continuation of my comparative study about the state compensation system in Japan and China made previously. In this article, on a larger scale, the state compensation system of main western countries, France, Germany, Britain, U.S.A, and the Asian countries, especially eastern Asian countries, are involved as the study objects.Storting from the different cultural and traditional background of Oriental law and Occidental law, not only the differences of the state compensation system between western countries and Asian countries but also the influence of state compensation system of western countries based on Continental law system and Anglo-American law system received by Asian countries are discussed.As an important component part of state compensation system, the liability of judicial compensation due to the illegal actions occurred injustice of criminal and civil cases and in law enforcement related to justice by policemen and other officials has been chosen as the focal point of this article. The characteristics of judicial compensation system and the required conditions in constituting judicial compensation of each country have been studied in detail. Besides, several issues related to judicial compensation and ways of solution are also discussed.