How should 'History of Greek and Roman Literature/Philosophy' be rewritten in consideration of the new trend of Greek and Roman History?

面对希腊罗马史的新动向，《希腊罗马文学/哲学史》该如何改写？

• 批准号: 14310226
• 负责人: ITSUMI Kiichiro
• 金额: $ 9.86万
• 依托单位: The University of Tokyo
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
• 财政年份: 2002
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2002 至 2005
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-14310226/
• 关键词: History of Greek Literature; History of Roman Literature; History of Greek Philosophy; History of Roman Philosophy; Ancient History; Classical Studies

Recently, Greek/Roman History tends to be more orientated towards cultural, sociological studies than before. The new history treats the poetical works or the philosophical ones as parts of the historical sources, or even documents. Its stimulation given to the traditional 'readings' of these works is great, but at the same time it is not rare that the new 'readings' astonish conventional scholars. At the same time the old types of History of Literature/Philosophy prove to be out of date. It is no good to arrange the works chronologically without any consideration of their social environment in which a literary work was appreciated.This research is an attempt to investigate the possibility of inter-disciplinary studies in 'Greek/Roman History' : not only by the historians but by the scholars in literature and in philosophy, those who are attached mainly to the University of Tokyo. It was, in fact, made up of a series of discussions and seminars.These are a few of necessities for a new history of literature/philosophy. It is important to investigate particular conventions derived from the genre which a work is attached to. It is also important to follow the development of the genre. Structural analyses and historical ones do not stand in dichotomy. Attention should be paid more to historiography, for the historical works themselves are written under the influence of particular points of view and not free from biases.

近年来，希腊/罗马史比以前更倾向于文化，社会学研究。新史学把诗歌作品或哲学作品当作史料的一部分，甚至当作文献。它对这些作品的传统“阅读”的刺激是巨大的，但与此同时，新的“阅读”对传统学者的挑战也并不罕见。与此同时，旧类型的文学/哲学史证明是过时的。如果不考虑文学作品被欣赏的社会环境，按时间顺序排列作品是没有好处的。本研究试图探讨“希腊/罗马史”跨学科研究的可能性：不仅是历史学家，而且是以东京大学为主的文学和哲学学者。事实上，它是由一系列的讨论和研讨会组成的。这些都是新的文学/哲学史的一些必需品。重要的是要调查特定的公约，从体裁的作品是重视。此外，还要关注流派的发展。结构分析和历史分析并不对立。应该更加重视历史编纂，因为历史著作本身是在特定观点的影响下撰写的，并非没有偏见。